AHLDashboard
‹ Tuesday, January 9

Ontario Reign at San Jose Barracuda

Tech CU Arena · San Jose, CA

Ontario Reign
4:1
Final
San Jose Barracuda

The sheet

ONTSJSolid with a pale centre = goal · outline = saved · area = expected goals
Deserve to winexpected goals
37%63%
xG
3.03.7
High danger
57
Chances
1115
Shots
3237

Each club’s colour washes in from its own end; where they meet is what the chances say. Centre ice is the halfway mark, so the gap between the seam and the red line is the argument. Goals are excluded on purpose.

Expected goals, minute by minute

01234P2P3
Cumulative expected goals · rings mark goals · dashed = goalie should be out, solid = goalie out

Win probability, as it happened

9050101st2nd3rd
SJ above the lineONT belowDots are goals. Pre-game 53% SJ.

The same model the scoreboard runs during a live game, replayed from this game’s goal times. It knows the score, the clock and what the two clubs were expected to do before puck drop; on a live night it also reads the man advantage and an empty net.

Head to head

32Shots on goal37
11Scoring chances15
5High-danger chances7
2.96Expected goals3.72

By period

PerSOGSCHDxG
1st9–81–10–00.5–0.5
2nd13–147–83–31.6–1.7
3rd10–153–62–40.8–1.6

Away–home, in that order.

Pulling the goalie

SJ−30:005:0010:0015:0020:00
Solid bar = net should be emptyDashed = league-median pullHollow dot = empty-net goal
TrailingFirst behind byNet empty fromTime leftEmpty-net timeWorth
SJ30:00 of the 3rd20:0020:00+0.024 pts

“Worth” is the standings points the empty net is expected to add, from that moment on, over pulling when AHL benches actually do. It is an expectation across every way the rest of the game could have gone, not a claim about this one result — a team can follow the rule perfectly and still lose by two.

In goal

Shots faced
37
Saves
36
Allowed
1
xGA
3.72
GSAx
+2.72
Shots faced
32
Saves
28
Allowed
4
xGA
2.95
GSAx
-1.05

Goals saved above expected is what the chances faced were worth minus what actually went in, so a positive number is work the shot quality did not account for. Empty-net shots have no goaltender and are left out.

Scoring and penalties

  • 1st 4:05Samuel Fagemo (1–0)low · 48 ft · beat Eetu Makiniemi
  • 1st 5:14Penalty
  • 1st 10:34Penalty
  • 1st 19:50Penalty
  • 1st 19:50Penalty
  • 2nd 1:25Penalty
  • 2nd 2:25Charles Hudon (2–0)5v4 · medium · 33 ft · beat Eetu Makiniemi
  • 2nd 5:16Penalty
  • 2nd 5:35Akil Thomas (3–0)4v5 · grade A · 7 ft · beat Eetu Makiniemi
  • 2nd 19:45Penalty
  • 3rd 7:49Penalty
  • 3rd 7:49Penalty
  • 3rd 12:57Danil Gushchin (3–1)low · 22 ft · beat Erik Portillo
  • 3rd 13:07Penalty
  • 3rd 19:08Samuel Fagemo (4–1)empty net · low · 29 ft · beat Eetu Makiniemi