ThomasMilic
6'0", 174 lb, catches L, born April 14, 2003
Compare Milic with another player- 21
- Games
- 5
- Wins
- 87.7%
- Save %
- 3.44
- Goals Against Average
- 0
- Shutouts
The story
Milic allowed 14.2 goals more than the shots he faced were worth — 63rd of 70 in goals saved above expected, 67th of 70 in save percentage.
Against the league
Each bar is a percentile against the 70 goalies with at least 15 games. The tick is the league median. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.
Where he was beaten
Goals allowed less the goals those shots were worth, by where they came from. Red is ice he was beaten from more often than the chances warranted; green is ice he shut down. It sums to his goals saved above expected.
Shots faced, against the league
Every goaltender faces the same slot-heavy map, so this draws only the difference: warm is where he faced more shots than a typical goalie would across the same workload, cool is where he faced fewer. It is a picture of the defence in front of him as much as of him.
By danger
| Zone | Shots | Goals | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|
| High danger | 93 | 30 | 67.7% |
| Medium | 105 | 15 | 85.7% |
| Low | 375 | 27 | 92.8% |
| All shots | 571 | 70 | 87.7% |
Rebound control
| Saves | Leaked | Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All saves | 501 | 32 | 6.4% |
| High danger | 63 | 6 | 9.5% |
A save “leaks” when the shooting club gets another attempt within three seconds. The high-danger split separates goaltenders the overall rate does not.
Workload
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Shots against | 571 |
| Saves | 501 |
| Goals against | 70 |
| Expected goals against | 55.80 |
| Goals saved above expected | -14.20 |
| Minutes | 1222:10 |
In the AHL
| Season | Club | GP | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | MB | 41 | 90.5% |
| 2024-25 | MB | 21 | 87.7% |
| 2023-24 | MB | 33 | 90.0% |
Every AHL season on file. A career total is only the AHL portion — junior, college and NHL games are not in this database.
Recent starts
| Date | Opp | Faced | Allowed | xGA | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04-11 | vs IA | 35 | 3 | 2.89 | 91.4% |
| 04-05 | vs CHI | 29 | 4 | 3.09 | 86.2% |
| 04-02 | vs LAV | 28 | 3 | 2.42 | 89.3% |
| 02-26 | @ BEL | 34 | 2 | 3.17 | 94.1% |
| 01-23 | vs GR | 29 | 5 | 2.10 | 82.8% |
| 01-08 | @ MIL | 35 | 3 | 2.61 | 91.4% |
| 01-05 | @ CGY | 25 | 2 | 2.80 | 92.0% |
| 01-03 | @ CGY | 22 | 2 | 3.03 | 90.9% |
| 12-31 | vs TEX | 23 | 3 | 1.64 | 87.0% |
| 12-22 | vs RFD | 19 | 5 | 2.84 | 73.7% |
| 12-10 | @ CGY | 40 | 6 | 5.06 | 85.0% |
| 12-07 | vs BEL | 35 | 3 | 2.87 | 91.4% |