IsaiahSaville
6'1", 207 lb, catches R, born September 21, 2000
Compare Saville with another player- 8
- Games
- 6
- Wins
- 92.9%
- Save %
- 2.05
- Goals Against Average
- 0
- Shutouts
Against the league
Fewer than 15 games, so nothing here is ranked. The numbers above are real.
Where he was beaten
Goals allowed less the goals those shots were worth, by where they came from. Red is ice he was beaten from more often than the chances warranted; green is ice he shut down. It sums to his goals saved above expected.
Shots faced, against the league
Every goaltender faces the same slot-heavy map, so this draws only the difference: warm is where he faced more shots than a typical goalie would across the same workload, cool is where he faced fewer. It is a picture of the defence in front of him as much as of him.
By danger
| Zone | Shots | Goals | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|
| High danger | 26 | 6 | 76.9% |
| Medium | 42 | 5 | 88.1% |
| Low | 143 | 5 | 96.5% |
| All shots | 210 | 15 | 92.9% |
Rebound control
| Saves | Leaked | Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All saves | 195 | 4 | 2.1% |
| High danger | 20 | 0 | 0.0% |
A save “leaks” when the shooting club gets another attempt within three seconds. The high-danger split separates goaltenders the overall rate does not.
Workload
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Shots against | 210 |
| Saves | 195 |
| Goals against | 15 |
| Expected goals against | 18.51 |
| Goals saved above expected | 3.51 |
| Minutes | 438:26 |
In the AHL
| Season | Club | GP | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ONT | 8 | 91.6% |
| 2023-24 | HSK | 22 | 89.3% |
| 2022-23 | HSK | 10 | 90.2% |
| 2021-22 | HSK | 8 | 92.9% |
Every AHL season on file. A career total is only the AHL portion — junior, college and NHL games are not in this database.
Recent starts
| Date | Opp | Faced | Allowed | xGA | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04-23 | vs SJ | 21 | 2 | 1.69 | 90.5% |
| 04-22 | vs SJ | 31 | 4 | 2.60 | 87.1% |
| 04-16 | vs STK | 38 | 1 | 2.61 | 97.4% |
| 04-15 | vs STK | 29 | 2 | 2.95 | 93.1% |
| 04-10 | @ SJ | 32 | 3 | 3.40 | 90.6% |
| 04-04 | vs RFD | 30 | 1 | 2.39 | 96.7% |
| 03-30 | @ BAK | 9 | 0 | 1.22 | 100.0% |
| 03-26 | vs TUC | 21 | 3 | 1.65 | 85.7% |