TORNorth Division · 3rd of 8
TorontoMarlies
- 2-1-0
- Record
- 4
- Points
- 11
- Goals for
- 10
- Against
- +1
- Differential
Where TOR ranks
Expected Goals For % · 6 of 32
B+56.10%
xGF/60 · 5 of 32
A3.47
xGA/60 · 12 of 32
B2.71
Scoring Chance % · 10 of 32
B53.13%
High Danger Chance % · 4 of 32
A64.29%
Shooting % · 17 of 32
C10.78%
Save % · 22 of 32
D87.3%
PDO · 22 of 32
D98.1%
Power Play % · 16 of 32
C18.75%
Penalty Kill % · 13 of 32
C+87.50%
Special Teams Index · 11 of 32
B106.25%
Rush Share of Goals · 25 of 32
D27.3%
Goals For · 6 of 32
B+11
Goals Against · 23 of 32
D10
Shots for and against
TOR102 shots · 11 xG
quiet0.7 xG per 5 ft
Allowed79 shots · 8 xG
quiet0.7 xG per 5 ft
Special teams
| Goals | Chances | Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power play | 3 | 16 | 18.8% |
| Penalty kill | 2 | 16 | 87.5% |
Special-teams index 106.3
How the game unfolds
1st period75.0%of goals scored
- Goals
- 6–2
- xG share
- 63.5%
2nd period25.0%of goals scored
- Goals
- 2–6
- xG share
- 38.9%
3rd period50.0%of goals scored
- Goals
- 2–2
- xG share
- 73.9%
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| Goals against | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| xG for | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| xG against | 2.0 | 4.8 | 1.4 |
| Shots for | 34 | 25 | 40 |
| Shots against | 23 | 38 | 16 |
How the goals came
| Goals | For | Share | Against | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 3 | 27.3% | 6 | 60.0% |
| Off the cycle | 4 | 36.4% | 3 | 30.0% |
| In a scramble | 3 | 27.3% | 1 | 10.0% |
| Attempts | For | Sh% | Against | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 24 | 12.5% | 27 | 77.8% |
| Off the cycle | 68 | 5.9% | 49 | 93.9% |
| In a scramble | 10 | 30.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
Volume
| For | Against | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 102 | 79 |
| Expected goals | 10.7 | 8.4 |
| Scoring chances | 34 | — |
| High-danger chances | 18 | — |
| Goals | 11 | 10 |
| Empty-net goals | 0 | 0 |
| Goals above expected | — | — |
With a lead, level, and from behind
| Score state | Share of play | GF–GA | GF% | GF% ex. EN | xGF% | SF% | Sh%ex. EN | Sv%ex. EN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading | 28%50 min | 4–4 | 50.0%lg 52.3% | 50.0%lg 45.1% | 59.2%lg 49.5% | 57.4%lg 45.5% | 12.9%lg 10.0% | 82.6%lg 90.2% |
| Tied | 43%77 min | 2–4 | 33.3%lg 50.0% | 33.3%lg 50.0% | 45.7%lg 50.0% | 52.1%lg 50.0% | 5.4%lg 8.7% | 88.2%lg 91.3% |
| Trailing | 29%52 min | 4–2 | 66.7%lg 46.9% | 66.7%lg 52.3% | 65.9%lg 54.1% | 60.8%lg 53.2% | 12.9%lg 9.8% | 90.0%lg 89.7% |