AHLDashboard
TUCPacific Division · 5th of 10

TucsonRoadrunners

2-2-0
Record
4
Points
14
Goals for
12
Against
+2
Differential

Where TUC ranks

Expected Goals For % · 14 of 32
51.29%
xGF/60 · 13 of 32
2.87
xGA/60 · 14 of 32
2.72
Scoring Chance % · 10 of 32
54.12%
High Danger Chance % · 15 of 32
51.85%
Shooting % · 8 of 32
12.17%
Save % · 15 of 32
90.2%
PDO · 11 of 32
102.4%
Power Play % · 8 of 32
21.43%
Penalty Kill % · 10 of 32
87.50%
Special Teams Index · 9 of 32
108.93%
Rush Share of Goals · 11 of 32
42.9%
Goals For · 3 of 32
14
Goals Against · 23 of 32
12

Shots for and against

TUC115 shots · 11 xG
quiet0.6 xG per 5 ft
Allowed123 shots · 11 xG
quiet0.6 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play31421.4%
Penalty kill32487.5%

Special-teams index 108.9

How the game unfolds

1st period55.6%of goals scored
Goals
5–4
xG share
53.3%
2nd period54.5%of goals scored
Goals
6–5
xG share
50.6%
3rd period50.0%of goals scored
Goals
3–3
xG share
49.3%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for563
Goals against453
xG for4.63.73.2
xG against4.03.63.3
Shots for453733
Shots against463443

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush642.9%541.7%
Off the cycle642.9%541.7%
In a scramble214.3%216.7%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush3716.2%2982.8%
Off the cycle708.6%9094.4%
In a scramble825.0%450.0%

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots115123
Expected goals11.510.9
Scoring chances46—
High-danger chances14—
Goals1412
Empty-net goals00
Goals above expected——

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading40%96 min7–463.6%lg 52.6%60.0%lg 46.1%46.4%lg 47.8%42.3%lg 46.0%14.0%lg 10.1%93.3%lg 90.2%
Tied27%65 min3–442.9%lg 50.0%42.9%lg 50.0%49.1%lg 50.0%48.4%lg 50.0%9.7%lg 8.7%87.9%lg 91.3%
Trailing33%79 min4–450.0%lg 50.6%57.1%lg 58.1%60.2%lg 56.4%57.1%lg 55.0%10.0%lg 10.5%89.7%lg 90.4%