
TorontoMarlies
Coca-Cola Coliseum, Toronto, ON
- 36-26-10
- Record
- 82
- Points
- 229
- Goals for
- 228
- Against
- +1
- Differential
The story
By chance quality TOR were a middle club: 31st of 32 in creation, 18th of 32 in suppression.
They finished 49 goals above what the chances were worth (4th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 33 more than the chances against were worth (17th of 32 in save percentage).
The penalty kill 7th of 32 at 83.3%.
Where TOR ranks
Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.
Shots for and against
Special teams
| Goals | Chances | Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power play | 55 | 299 | 18.4% |
| Penalty kill | 53 | 318 | 83.3% |
Special-teams index 101.7 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.
How the game unfolds
- Goals
- 61–68
- xG share
- 46.4%
- Goals
- 82–67
- xG share
- 50.8%
- Goals
- 78–83
- xG share
- 46.8%
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 61 | 82 | 78 |
| Goals against | 68 | 67 | 83 |
| xG for | 54.4 | 66.7 | 56.1 |
| xG against | 62.7 | 64.5 | 63.8 |
| Shots for | 611 | 672 | 560 |
| Shots against | 689 | 694 | 674 |
Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.
How the goals came
| Goals | For | Share | Against | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 87 | 38.0% | 94 | 41.2% |
| Off the cycle | 107 | 46.7% | 98 | 43.0% |
| In a scramble | 32 | 14.0% | 31 | 13.6% |
| Attempts | For | Sh% | Against | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 472 | 18.4% | 479 | 80.4% |
| Off the cycle | 1290 | 8.3% | 1479 | 93.4% |
| In a scramble | 108 | 29.6% | 129 | 76.0% |
A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.
Volume
| For | Against | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 1870 | 2087 |
| Expected goals | 180.2 | 195.2 |
| Scoring chances | 656 | — |
| High-danger chances | 290 | — |
With a lead, level, and from behind
| Score state | Share of play | GF–GA | GF% | GF% ex. EN | xGF% | SF% | Sh%ex. EN | Sv%ex. EN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading | 36%2,053 min | 106–88 | 54.6%lg 52.5% | 49.4%lg 47.9% | 47.1%lg 48.1% | 43.4%lg 46.5% | 11.0%lg 10.4% | 91.6%lg 90.4% |
| Tied | 30%1,738 min | 82–92 | 47.1%lg 50.0% | 47.1%lg 50.0% | 49.0%lg 50.0% | 48.4%lg 50.0% | 10.4%lg 9.6% | 89.1%lg 90.4% |
| Trailing | 34%1,970 min | 105–96 | 52.2%lg 47.4% | 56.1%lg 52.1% | 50.7%lg 52.0% | 51.1%lg 53.5% | 11.8%lg 9.6% | 90.2%lg 89.6% |
Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; TOR being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.
2025-26 skaters · 38
| Player | GP | G | A | P | SOG | ixG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan ShawF | 72 | 23 | 31 | 54 | 133 | 17.09 |
| Alex NylanderRW | 65 | 24 | 29 | 53 | 153 | 16.02 |
| Benoit-Olivier GroulxC | 59 | 28 | 24 | 52 | 136 | 15.36 |
| Vinni LettieriC | 55 | 14 | 28 | 42 | 142 | 13.39 |
| Jacob QuillanC | 40 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 70 | 10.61 |
| Ryan TverbergF | 63 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 88 | 13.24 |
| Luke HaymesC | 66 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 110 | 14.54 |
| William VilleneuveD | 61 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 85 | 3.67 |
| Travis BoydF | 34 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 47 | 4.90 |
| Matthew BarboliniF | 62 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 55 | 6.01 |
| Marc JohnstoneRW | 57 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 69 | 7.97 |
| Borya ValisF | 60 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 115 | 12.10 |
| Henry ThrunD | 55 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 79 | 3.82 |
| Noah ChadwickD | 68 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 77 | 3.99 |
| Cédric ParéF | 62 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 77 | 10.07 |
| Matt BenningD | 34 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 48 | 1.53 |
| Reese JohnsonRW | 47 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 66 | 6.75 |
| Michael PezzettaLW | 39 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 42 | 4.09 |
| Blake SmithD | 62 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 59 | 1.85 |
| Chas SharpeD | 33 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 41 | 1.26 |
| Dakota MermisD | 27 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 37 | 1.72 |
| Marshall RifaiD | 20 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 27 | 0.96 |
| Ben KingC | 20 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 2.10 |
| Brandon BaddockLW | 20 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 1.33 |
| Cade WebberD | 33 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0.36 |
| Easton CowanLW | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0.59 |
| John ProkopD | 24 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0.66 |
| Landon SimF | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 1.47 |
| Ryan KirwanLW | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1.21 |
| Brandon BuhrF | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.19 |
| David KämpfF | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.29 |
| Miroslav HolinkaC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Rhett ParsonsD | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.05 |
| Vinny BorgesiD | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0.30 |
| Frank DjurasevicD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.07 |
| Hayes HundleyD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.02 |
| Ryan McClearyD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Sam StevensC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.62 |
2025-26 goaltending
| Goalie | GP | W | SV% | GAA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artur Akhtyamov | 37 | 21 | 90.4% | 2.88 | -8.3 |
| Dennis Hildeby | 23 | 10 | 89.8% | 2.71 | -2.9 |
| Vyacheslav Peksa | 12 | 4 | 86.9% | 3.78 | -7.9 |
| Joseph Woll | 2 | 0 | 88.5% | 3.72 | -0.1 |
| Ken Appleby | 2 | 1 | 90.9% | 2.55 | 0.4 |
Last 10 games
| Date | Opp | Result | Goals | xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-19 | vs CHI | W | 4–3 | 2.0–2.0 |
| 2026-06-18 | vs CHI | OTL | 3–4 | 3.4–1.7 |
| 2026-06-16 | vs CHI | W | 1–0 | 2.0–1.5 |
| 2026-06-14 | @ CHI | W | 5–4 | 3.7–3.3 |
| 2026-06-12 | @ CHI | W | 4–2 | 2.3–2.2 |
| 2026-06-07 | @ WBS | W | 2–1 | 3.1–2.7 |
| 2026-06-05 | vs WBS | W | 5–1 | 2.2–2.6 |
| 2026-06-03 | vs WBS | L | 3–4 | 2.9–2.2 |
| 2026-06-01 | vs WBS | L | 3–5 | 4.8–3.4 |
| 2026-05-29 | @ WBS | W | 2–1 | 3.1–2.7 |