Henderson SilverKnights
Lee's Family Forum, Henderson, NV
- 39-21-12
- Record
- 90
- Points
- 263
- Goals for
- 225
- Against
- +38
- Differential
The story
HSK generated chances (3rd of 32) and gave them back (14th of 32 in chances allowed).
They finished 35 goals above what the chances were worth (6th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 32 more than the chances against were worth (20th of 32 in save percentage).
The power play was 1st of 32 at 25.7% and the penalty kill 28th of 32 at 78.3%.
Where HSK ranks
Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.
Shots for and against
Special teams
| Goals | Chances | Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power play | 68 | 265 | 25.7% |
| Penalty kill | 50 | 230 | 78.3% |
Special-teams index 103.9 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.
How the game unfolds
- Goals
- 82–61
- xG share
- 54.8%
- Goals
- 84–73
- xG share
- 54.4%
- Goals
- 92–79
- xG share
- 53.7%
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 82 | 84 | 92 |
| Goals against | 61 | 73 | 79 |
| xG for | 74.5 | 79.2 | 71.8 |
| xG against | 61.6 | 66.5 | 61.8 |
| Shots for | 727 | 741 | 705 |
| Shots against | 629 | 669 | 673 |
Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.
How the goals came
| Goals | For | Share | Against | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 110 | 41.8% | 77 | 34.2% |
| Off the cycle | 112 | 42.6% | 109 | 48.4% |
| In a scramble | 40 | 15.2% | 34 | 15.1% |
| Attempts | For | Sh% | Against | Sv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off the rush | 574 | 19.2% | 473 | 83.7% |
| Off the cycle | 1482 | 7.6% | 1387 | 92.1% |
| In a scramble | 153 | 26.1% | 142 | 76.1% |
A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.
Volume
| For | Against | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 2209 | 2002 |
| Expected goals | 228.4 | 193.4 |
| Scoring chances | 877 | — |
| High-danger chances | 409 | — |
With a lead, level, and from behind
| Score state | Share of play | GF–GA | GF% | GF% ex. EN | xGF% | SF% | Sh%ex. EN | Sv%ex. EN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading | 38%1,792 min | 105–94 | 52.8%lg 52.5% | 48.9%lg 47.9% | 51.6%lg 48.1% | 48.4%lg 46.4% | 10.8%lg 10.4% | 89.6%lg 90.4% |
| Tied | 34%1,571 min | 87–74 | 54.0%lg 50.0% | 54.0%lg 50.0% | 52.2%lg 50.0% | 51.7%lg 50.0% | 11.0%lg 9.6% | 89.9%lg 90.4% |
| Trailing | 28%1,317 min | 80–64 | 55.6%lg 47.5% | 63.5%lg 52.1% | 60.1%lg 52.1% | 57.8%lg 53.4% | 11.6%lg 9.6% | 90.5%lg 89.7% |
Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; HSK being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.
2025-26 skaters · 29
| Player | GP | G | A | P | SOG | ixG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanner LaczynskiF | 62 | 22 | 42 | 64 | 143 | 19.55 |
| Raphael LavoieF | 45 | 30 | 26 | 56 | 175 | 22.62 |
| Kai UchaczF | 68 | 20 | 31 | 51 | 127 | 15.90 |
| Ben HemmerlingF | 68 | 21 | 29 | 50 | 119 | 15.56 |
| Trevor ConnellyF | 46 | 14 | 35 | 49 | 120 | 14.08 |
| Jeremy DaviesD | 72 | 9 | 38 | 47 | 143 | 8.84 |
| Lukas CormierD | 49 | 8 | 39 | 47 | 121 | 7.53 |
| Dylan CoghlanD | 62 | 14 | 30 | 44 | 143 | 7.78 |
| Mitch McLainF | 71 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 158 | 19.30 |
| Matyas SapovalivF | 72 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 108 | 15.23 |
| Jakub BrabenecF | 62 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 90 | 11.63 |
| Braeden BowmanF | 20 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 32 | 5.14 |
| Jackson HallumF | 69 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 82 | 9.74 |
| Jonas RøndbjergF | 43 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 107 | 13.79 |
| Tuomas UronenF | 57 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 101 | 9.01 |
| Viliam KmecD | 65 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 77 | 3.51 |
| Joe FlemingF | 60 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 45 | 4.57 |
| Mathieu CatafordF | 59 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 70 | 7.66 |
| Jaycob MegnaD | 64 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 81 | 2.73 |
| Alexander HoltzF | 13 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 21 | 2.64 |
| Brandon HickeyD | 37 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 39 | 1.31 |
| Sloan StanickF | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 2.49 |
| Lucas JohansenD | 30 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 1.05 |
| Christoffer SedoffD | 50 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 43 | 2.19 |
| Riley McKayF | 28 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 2.46 |
| Artur CholachD | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0.25 |
| Jakub DemekF | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1.54 |
| Jordan GustafsonF | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.55 |
| Samuel MayerD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.38 |
2025-26 goaltending
| Goalie | GP | W | SV% | GAA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Lindbom | 35 | 24 | 92.6% | 2.16 | 20.8 |
| Jesper Vikman | 18 | 8 | 86.6% | 3.41 | -17.1 |
| Cameron Whitehead | 17 | 6 | 87.3% | 3.54 | -12.6 |
| Carter Hart | 3 | 1 | 83.9% | 3.07 | -3.0 |
Last 10 games
| Date | Opp | Result | Goals | xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-09 | @ COL | L | 2–6 | 1.8–3.5 |
| 2026-05-06 | @ COL | L | 0–4 | 1.4–1.7 |
| 2026-05-04 | vs COL | W | 4–3 | 4.7–3.4 |
| 2026-05-01 | vs COL | L | 0–1 | 1.1–1.7 |
| 2026-04-24 | vs SJ | W | 5–1 | 3.7–1.9 |
| 2026-04-22 | vs SJ | W | 5–4 | 3.3–2.1 |
| 2026-04-18 | @ TUC | L | 4–5 | 2.9–3.0 |
| 2026-04-17 | @ TUC | OTL | 1–2 | 3.2–3.1 |
| 2026-04-14 | vs BAK | W | 3–2 | 2.6–2.4 |
| 2026-04-11 | vs SJ | W | 4–1 | 3.5–2.6 |