AHLDashboard
BRIAtlantic Division · 4th of 8 · New York Islanders

BridgeportIslanders

Total Mortgage Arena, Bridgeport, CT

34-30-8
Record
76
Points
219
Goals for
222
Against
-3
Differential
At home21-12-3121–105 (+16)
On the road13-18-598–117 (-19)
Last 107-3-0 · oldest first

The story

BRI were a suppression team: 3rd of 32 in chances allowed, but only 20th of 32 in chances created.

They finished 29 goals above what the chances were worth (17th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 42 more than the chances against were worth (28th of 32 in save percentage).

Where BRI ranks

Expected Goals For % · 12 of 32
51.42%
xGF/60 · 20 of 32
2.60
xGA/60 · 3 of 32
2.45
Scoring Chance % · 11 of 32
51.81%
High Danger Chance % · 18 of 32
48.77%
Shooting % · 17 of 32
10.99%
Save % · 28 of 32
88.2%
PDO · 20 of 32
99.2%
Power Play % · 24 of 32
17.02%
Penalty Kill % · 15 of 32
81.28%
Special Teams Index · 21 of 32
98.30%
Rush Share of Goals · 19 of 32
39.7%
Goals For · 19 of 32
219
Goals Against · 14 of 32
222

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

BRI1,993 shots · 190 xG
quiet3.8 xG per 5 ft
Allowed1,883 shots · 180 xG
quiet3.8 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play4023517.0%
Penalty kill3820381.3%

Special-teams index 98.3 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period55.6%of goals scored
Goals
79–63
xG share
53.4%
2nd period47.8%of goals scored
Goals
64–70
xG share
50.9%
3rd period46.0%of goals scored
Goals
69–81
xG share
50.2%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for796469
Goals against637081
xG for63.866.657.4
xG against55.764.157.0
Shots for683662624
Shots against629627596

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush8739.7%8940.1%
Off the cycle10045.7%9944.6%
In a scramble2812.8%2913.1%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush51716.8%51382.7%
Off the cycle13557.4%125592.1%
In a scramble12123.1%11574.8%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots19931883
Expected goals190.2179.7
Scoring chances701—
High-danger chances257—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading35%1,533 min90–7853.6%lg 52.6%50.3%lg 47.9%49.3%lg 48.2%48.3%lg 46.2%12.1%lg 10.5%89.0%lg 90.4%
Tied32%1,430 min65–5952.4%lg 50.0%52.4%lg 50.0%52.6%lg 50.0%51.6%lg 50.0%9.9%lg 9.6%90.4%lg 90.4%
Trailing33%1,477 min59–8441.3%lg 47.3%47.2%lg 52.1%53.0%lg 51.9%54.7%lg 53.6%8.5%lg 9.6%88.1%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; BRI being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 35

PlayerGPGAPSOGixG
Matt LuffRW6218345213213.92
Adam BeckmanLW6830215117819.05
Liam FoudyF6026214713417.13
Matthew HighmoreC70152540869.61
Matthew MaggioF6312213313312.50
Marshall WarrenD56626321127.22
Alex JefferiesF609202910110.24
Joey LarsonF6317112813516.52
Cole McWardD63621271025.29
Ethan BearD4042327362.37
Daylan KueflerF671015251009.14
Hunter DrewRW6213112410311.64
Chris TerryF56101121819.10
Cam BergF5371320687.10
Isaiah GeorgeD4721618503.28
Cam ThiesingF639817848.79
Sean DayD6131417572.88
Travis MitchellD5811617754.16
Pierrick DubéRW245914363.87
Luke RoweD6221113682.98
Julien GauthierRW257512424.08
Eetu LiukasF244610261.85
Victor EklundF93710172.05
Cole EisermanF12279212.17
C.J. SmithF17088253.12
Marc GatcombF15448396.37
Gleb VeremyevF22314233.07
Calle OdeliusD20123150.59
Calum RitchieC312360.78
Jesse PulkkinenD20022110.42
Max DorringtonF211210.09
Andrej ŠustrD1101180.17
Drew CallinF401160.61
Daniil ProkhorovF10000—
Scott ReedyF600070.82

2025-26 goaltending

GoalieGPWSV%GAAGSAx
Marcus Högberg311289.0%2.92-7.6
Henrik Tikkanen291789.7%2.65-7.4
Parker Gahagen7286.5%3.62-6.7
Jeremy Smith5190.7%2.20-1.3
Semyon Varlamov2293.9%1.501.3
Josh Kotai1090.9%1.390.4

Full schedule · 72 regular + 2 playoff

RecentFull schedule
DateOppResultGoalsxG
2025-10-11vs PROOTL2–32.5–2.2
2025-10-12vs BELW6–22.9–2.4
2025-10-17vs PROL3–53.0–3.0
2025-10-18vs WBSL3–62.5–2.8
2025-10-24@ HFDW3–04.1–3.0
2025-10-26@ PROL1–42.0–2.0
2025-10-29vs HERL1–31.7–2.3
2025-10-31@ WBSL2–32.2–3.1
2025-11-02vs SPRW2–13.6–2.9
2025-11-05vs LVL2–65.0–2.8
2025-11-07@ SPRW6–24.5–3.0
2025-11-08vs SPRW6–14.4–2.9
2025-11-12vs WBSOTL4–52.8–1.9
2025-11-14@ WBSL3–53.8–2.8
2025-11-15vs ROCL3–51.9–2.6
2025-11-21@ ROCW5–42.3–1.8
2025-11-22@ SYRL3–52.7–2.8
2025-11-28vs SPRL3–62.6–2.1
2025-11-29@ SPRW3–22.9–2.9
2025-12-05@ UTCL1–53.6–1.9
2025-12-06vs HFDW6–22.5–1.3
2025-12-13@ LAVW2–12.9–1.7
2025-12-14@ BELW4–32.1–2.5
2025-12-17vs SYRL0–51.8–4.3
2025-12-19@ LVW5–12.0–1.9
2025-12-20@ HERL1–41.4–2.7
2025-12-27vs HFDL2–52.3–2.2
2025-12-28@ SPROTL3–43.6–1.8
2025-12-31@ HFDW4–02.5–2.2
2026-01-02@ SPRL2–41.9–2.9
2026-01-03vs HFDL1–42.0–3.6
2026-01-09@ PROL1–42.4–4.2
2026-01-10vs UTCW4–22.4–2.0
2026-01-11vs HFDW5–13.7–3.0
2026-01-16@ LVW3–14.0–3.0
2026-01-17vs SPRW4–12.3–1.6
2026-01-19vs LVW6–22.3–3.0
2026-01-23@ HFDL2–32.2–2.0
2026-01-24vs PROOTL3–42.2–2.7
2026-01-30@ HFDW6–33.0–2.1
2026-01-31@ LVL3–52.2–1.7
2026-02-01vs SPRW4–03.4–1.5
2026-02-04vs PROL1–22.5–1.4
2026-02-06@ UTCOTL1–22.4–2.1
2026-02-07vs LVW5–13.1–2.4
2026-02-14vs PROL2–41.6–1.4
2026-02-15@ PROOTL2–32.4–1.8
2026-02-17vs UTCW2–13.3–2.3
2026-02-20@ SPROTL4–53.5–3.8
2026-02-21@ WBSL3–42.3–3.2
2026-02-22vs WBSL0–41.8–2.7
2026-02-25vs CLTW4–33.5–3.7
2026-02-28@ PROOTL2–31.7–2.7
2026-03-01@ PROL2–33.2–1.5
2026-03-06@ HFDL0–61.8–2.7
2026-03-07vs PROW4–12.5–2.2
2026-03-08vs LVW5–42.3–3.1
2026-03-13@ CLTL0–31.8–3.1
2026-03-14@ CLTL0–22.6–1.7
2026-03-21vs HERW4–32.3–2.6
2026-03-22@ HERW6–32.6–1.6
2026-03-25vs CLTW3–22.8–2.6
2026-03-27vs LAVW3–22.3–3.1
2026-03-28@ PROL4–62.7–2.9
2026-04-01vs HERW4–12.0–3.8
2026-04-03vs HFDW4–22.0–2.3
2026-04-09vs WBSW6–53.1–3.1
2026-04-11@ LVL3–73.3–2.4
2026-04-12vs HFDW4–12.5–1.9
2026-04-15@ HFDW5–22.2–1.8
2026-04-17@ WBSL1–42.4–2.0
2026-04-18@ HERW2–11.9–2.6
2026-04-21vs HERPlayoffL0–21.2–1.0
2026-04-23@ HERPlayoffL2–52.3–2.1