LVAtlantic Division · 7th of 8 · Philadelphia Flyers

Lehigh ValleyPhantoms

PPL Center, Allentown, PA

31-35-6
Record: 68
Points: 210
Goals for: 247
Against: -37
Differential

At home16-16-4122–133 (-11)

On the road15-19-288–114 (-26)

Last 104-6-0 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality LV were a middle club: 16th of 32 in creation, 21st of 32 in suppression.

They finished 13 goals above what the chances were worth (19th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 44 more than the chances against were worth (30th of 32 in save percentage).

43% of their goals came off the rush, 8th of 32 — a club built on the first shot, not the cycle.

The penalty kill 29th of 32 at 77.0%.

Where LV ranks

Expected Goals For % · 18 of 32

49.22%

xGF/60 · 16 of 32

2.69

xGA/60 · 21 of 32

2.77

Scoring Chance % · 16 of 32

49.47%

High Danger Chance % · 15 of 32

49.16%

Shooting % · 19 of 32

10.74%

Save % · 30 of 32

87.9%

PDO · 25 of 32

98.7%

Power Play % · 20 of 32

17.86%

Penalty Kill % · 29 of 32

77.01%

Special Teams Index · 28 of 32

94.87%

Rush Share of Goals · 8 of 32

42.9%

Goals For · 22 of 32

210

Goals Against · 29 of 32

247

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

LV1,955 shots · 197 xG

quiet4.0 xG per 5 ft

Allowed2,049 shots · 203 xG

quiet4.0 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

	Goals	Chances	Rate
Power play	45	252	17.9%
Penalty kill	60	261	77.0%

Special-teams index 94.9 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period38.3%of goals scored

Goals: 51–82
xG share: 45.2%

2nd period48.2%of goals scored

Goals: 67–72
xG share: 49.1%

3rd period48.5%of goals scored

Goals: 82–87
xG share: 53.0%

	1st	2nd	3rd
Goals for	51	67	82
Goals against	82	72	87
xG for	57.0	66.9	69.3
xG against	69.2	69.4	61.4
Shots for	608	636	682
Shots against	724	664	631

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

Goals	For	Share	Against	Share
Off the rush	90	42.9%	91	36.8%
Off the cycle	80	38.1%	127	51.4%
In a scramble	35	16.7%	26	10.5%

Attempts	For	Sh%	Against	Sv%
Off the rush	556	16.2%	483	81.2%
Off the cycle	1277	6.3%	1446	91.2%
In a scramble	122	28.7%	120	78.3%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

	For	Against
Shots	1955	2049
Expected goals	197.2	203.4
Scoring chances	742	—
High-danger chances	293	—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score state	Share of play	GF–GA	GF%	GF% ex. EN	xGF%	SF%	Sh%ex. EN	Sv%ex. EN
Leading	27%1,180 min	57–54	51.4%lg 52.7%	45.5%lg 47.9%	42.7%lg 48.0%	42.8%lg 46.5%	9.9%lg 10.4%	91.3%lg 90.4%
Tied	28%1,217 min	51–69	42.5%lg 50.0%	42.5%lg 50.0%	47.6%lg 50.0%	47.7%lg 50.0%	9.8%lg 9.6%	87.9%lg 90.4%
Trailing	45%1,923 min	92–118	43.8%lg 47.3%	47.7%lg 52.2%	53.7%lg 51.8%	53.3%lg 53.7%	9.8%lg 9.6%	87.5%lg 89.5%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; LV being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 43

Player	GP	G	A	P	SOG	ixG
Lane PedersonC	63	23	25	48	143	17.98
Anthony RichardLW	66	18	27	45	133	15.43
Phil TomasinoRW	52	12	29	41	117	14.92
Cooper MarodyRW	56	13	23	36	93	13.89
Jacob GaucherF	69	20	16	36	104	14.66
Christian KyrouD	59	10	24	34	93	6.21
Tucker RobertsonF	63	13	15	28	84	8.72
Zayde WisdomC	70	14	13	27	120	12.67
Alex BumpF	36	11	15	26	116	13.10
Alexis GendronF	57	11	14	25	142	15.78
Boris KatchoukLW	46	11	14	25	58	7.15
Karsen DorwartF	70	10	14	24	100	9.58
Maxence GuenetteD	46	2	22	24	65	3.75
David JiříčekD	39	4	19	23	103	5.46
Brett HarrisonRW	58	10	11	21	59	6.67
Oliver BonkD	46	6	13	19	66	5.71
Ethan SamsonD	40	5	13	18	84	4.46
Denver BarkeyF	26	7	9	16	46	5.55
Garrett WilsonLW	54	4	12	16	57	6.71
Carl GrundströmF	19	6	9	15	54	7.68
Oscar EklindF	49	9	6	15	51	6.56
Helge GransD	61	3	11	14	81	4.22
Dennis GilbertD	37	0	13	13	22	0.98
Devin KaplanF	49	5	8	13	39	3.73
Samu TuomaalaF	19	2	8	10	35	3.38
Adam GinningD	42	2	6	8	55	2.51
Hunter McDonaldD	65	0	6	6	69	2.98
Ty MurchisonD	29	2	4	6	27	1.39
Emil AndraeD	7	0	5	5	8	0.48
Jackson EdwardD	16	1	3	4	8	0.35
Noah PowellRW	16	2	2	4	12	1.14
Riley ThompsonC	9	0	4	4	13	1.52
Carter BergerD	12	0	3	3	6	0.21
Cole KnubleC	7	1	2	3	15	2.13
Roman SchmidtD	48	0	3	3	43	1.98
Egor ZamulaD	3	0	2	2	3	0.21
Carson GolderRW	9	0	1	1	11	0.77
Jack BerglundC	5	1	0	1	9	1.11
Sawyer BoultonF	16	0	1	1	1	0.08
Artem GuryevD	6	0	0	0	5	0.17
Ben MeehanD	5	0	0	0	3	0.17
Hunter JohannesLW	2	0	0	0	1	0.16
Vincent SévignyD	14	0	0	0	12	0.61

2025-26 goaltending

Goalie	GP	W	SV%	GAA	GSAx
Aleksei Kolosov	38	15	89.5%	2.98	-6.5
Carson Bjarnason	32	14	87.7%	3.43	-17.9
Yaniv Perets	5	2	90.5%	2.71	0.6

Full schedule · 72 regular

Recent Full schedule

Date	Opp	Result	Goals	xG
2025-10-11	vs BEL	W	5–2	1.5–2.9
2025-10-12	vs WBS	L	1–4	3.0–3.1
2025-10-17	@ CLE	W	3–0	3.5–3.3
2025-10-18	@ CLE	W	3–2	2.7–3.5
2025-10-22	@ WBS	L	1–4	2.4–3.8
2025-10-24	vs HER	W	5–4	2.1–3.1
2025-10-25	@ HER	OTL	3–4	2.9–3.1
2025-10-29	@ LAV	L	0–3	1.4–3.1
2025-10-31	@ HFD	W	4–3	4.3–3.1
2025-11-01	@ HFD	W	4–3	3.1–2.2
2025-11-05	@ BRI	W	6–2	2.8–5.0
2025-11-08	vs TOR	W	3–2	3.1–2.2
2025-11-14	vs SPR	W	7–3	2.7–1.3
2025-11-15	vs HER	L	3–4	4.6–2.0
2025-11-16	@ HER	OTL	1–2	2.8–3.4
2025-11-19	vs ROC	W	4–2	1.3–2.0
2025-11-21	@ PRO	L	2–3	3.8–2.2
2025-11-22	@ HFD	W	3–2	2.6–2.2
2025-11-28	@ WBS	L	1–4	2.8–2.6
2025-11-29	vs LAV	OTL	4–5	4.4–3.7
2025-12-05	@ WBS	L	2–6	3.2–3.3
2025-12-06	vs UTC	W	3–2	3.0–3.2
2025-12-07	@ HER	L	2–3	2.3–3.2
2025-12-12	@ SYR	L	1–3	1.4–3.5
2025-12-13	@ ROC	W	2–1	4.8–2.1
2025-12-17	vs SPR	L	1–3	2.3–1.5
2025-12-19	vs BRI	L	1–5	1.9–2.0
2025-12-20	vs HFD	W	2–1	2.3–2.5
2025-12-28	vs WBS	W	4–3	3.2–2.9
2025-12-29	vs CLT	OTL	2–3	1.4–3.9
2025-12-31	vs HER	W	3–0	2.7–2.2
2026-01-03	@ BEL	W	3–1	2.6–1.9
2026-01-04	@ TOR	W	6–1	2.7–2.2
2026-01-10	@ SPR	W	3–2	2.5–1.3
2026-01-11	@ PRO	L	2–4	3.0–1.9
2026-01-16	vs BRI	L	1–3	3.0–4.0
2026-01-17	vs SYR	L	1–4	2.9–2.2
2026-01-19	@ BRI	L	2–6	3.0–2.3
2026-01-23	vs CLT	L	5–8	1.8–2.4
2026-01-24	vs HER	W	4–3	1.9–4.1
2026-01-30	@ SPR	L	1–2	2.1–2.2
2026-01-31	vs BRI	W	5–3	1.7–2.2
2026-02-01	vs WBS	L	2–6	2.5–3.0
2026-02-06	vs WBS	L	5–6	4.7–1.9
2026-02-07	@ BRI	L	1–5	2.4–3.1
2026-02-14	vs CLE	L	2–5	2.4–2.5
2026-02-15	vs SYR	L	1–3	2.3–2.6
2026-02-20	@ HER	W	4–1	3.5–3.2
2026-02-21	@ HER	W	6–4	4.8–3.7
2026-02-25	vs PRO	L	4–6	4.0–2.6
2026-02-28	vs HFD	OTL	4–5	2.0–2.2
2026-03-01	vs HFD	W	6–3	3.2–2.9
2026-03-03	@ UTC	L	1–4	2.3–2.0
2026-03-06	vs CLT	L	3–5	4.9–2.8
2026-03-07	vs CLT	OTL	4–5	2.5–2.9
2026-03-08	@ BRI	L	4–5	3.1–2.3
2026-03-13	@ SYR	W	4–1	2.6–4.1
2026-03-14	@ WBS	W	4–3	2.7–2.6
2026-03-15	vs WBS	L	1–3	1.2–1.9
2026-03-18	vs PRO	W	6–3	2.4–2.7
2026-03-21	@ CLT	L	1–5	2.2–3.5
2026-03-22	@ CLT	L	2–6	3.7–3.8
2026-03-27	vs SPR	L	3–5	2.3–3.5
2026-03-28	vs HER	W	4–2	2.4–2.4
2026-03-29	@ WBS	L	1–5	2.5–4.0
2026-04-03	@ WBS	L	1–3	2.3–3.6
2026-04-04	vs WBS	L	2–6	3.0–2.5
2026-04-11	vs BRI	W	7–3	2.4–3.3
2026-04-12	vs CLE	W	4–3	3.9–2.2
2026-04-15	@ SPR	L	1–7	2.1–3.4
2026-04-18	@ CLT	W	2–0	1.3–4.9
2026-04-19	@ CLT	L	1–4	2.2–2.3