AHLDashboard
SDPacific Division · 7th of 10 · Anaheim Ducks

San DiegoGulls

Pechanga Arena, San Diego, CA

33-27-12
Record
78
Points
224
Goals for
228
Against
-4
Differential
At home16-13-7114–111 (+3)
On the road17-14-5110–117 (-7)
Last 104-6-0 · oldest first

The story

SD generated chances (4th of 32) and gave them back (9th of 32 in chances allowed).

They conceded 41 more than the chances against were worth (25th of 32 in save percentage).

Only 33% of their goals came off the rush, 30th of 32 — the offence was built on the cycle and the point.

Where SD ranks

Expected Goals For % · 4 of 32
54.12%
xGF/60 · 4 of 32
3.01
xGA/60 · 9 of 32
2.55
Scoring Chance % · 5 of 32
53.44%
High Danger Chance % · 6 of 32
54.02%
Shooting % · 28 of 32
9.86%
Save % · 25 of 32
88.5%
PDO · 27 of 32
98.3%
Power Play % · 14 of 32
19.16%
Penalty Kill % · 10 of 32
83.11%
Special Teams Index · 10 of 32
102.26%
Rush Share of Goals · 30 of 32
33.5%
Goals For · 16 of 32
224
Goals Against · 18 of 32
228

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

SD2,272 shots · 221 xG
quiet3.5 xG per 5 ft
Allowed1,981 shots · 187 xG
quiet3.5 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play5026119.2%
Penalty kill3721983.1%

Special-teams index 102.3 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period52.7%of goals scored
Goals
68–61
xG share
54.8%
2nd period43.8%of goals scored
Goals
67–86
xG share
53.1%
3rd period54.6%of goals scored
Goals
83–69
xG share
55.6%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for686783
Goals against618669
xG for68.577.272.8
xG against56.668.258.2
Shots for747773729
Shots against637697607

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush7533.5%9039.5%
Off the cycle11250.0%10244.7%
In a scramble3515.6%3214.0%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush51514.6%49381.7%
Off the cycle15877.1%134592.4%
In a scramble17020.6%14377.6%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots22721981
Expected goals220.9187.3
Scoring chances807—
High-danger chances349—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading32%1,406 min77–7750.0%lg 52.7%43.8%lg 47.9%51.3%lg 48.0%49.9%lg 46.5%8.9%lg 10.4%88.9%lg 90.4%
Tied32%1,411 min69–7248.9%lg 50.0%48.9%lg 50.0%52.9%lg 50.0%52.0%lg 50.0%9.8%lg 9.6%88.9%lg 90.4%
Trailing37%1,623 min73–7649.0%lg 47.4%52.9%lg 52.1%57.5%lg 52.0%57.9%lg 53.5%8.1%lg 9.6%89.9%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; SD being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 30

PlayerGPGAPSOGixG
Sasha PastujovRW7121365724325.24
Matthew PhillipsRW7116365215421.24
Ryan CarpenterC7117314812316.64
Justin BaileyRW7125174214614.41
Tristan LuneauD701031411569.10
Judd CaulfieldRW7117213810513.63
Sam ColangeloF4912243613414.71
Nathan GaucherC6215142910410.37
Yegor SidorovRW6815142913615.05
Tim WasheC361413278711.40
Roland McKeownD71520251095.85
Nikolas BrouillardD67420241016.21
Stian SolbergD711212241266.66
Jan MyšákC5610132312515.27
Nico MyatovicLW7171219879.07
Tyson HindsD6251419915.19
Cal BurkeC5851217707.65
Nikita NesterenkoLW3551015464.51
Noah WarrenD6121012452.30
Coulson PitreRW25235222.27
Roger McQueenC712380.96
Matt BasgallD411270.26
Drew ElliottLW6101111.14
Konnor SmithD1301190.29
Travis HoweRW2101160.50
Herman TräffRW300020.12
Ian MooreD400040.15
Lucas PetterssonC400040.37
Owen LindmarkC30000—
Roman KinalD14000110.32

2025-26 goaltending

GoalieGPWSV%GAAGSAx
Calle Clang361889.7%2.80-12.8
Ville Husso17890.3%2.553.0
Tomas Suchanek15587.9%3.31-9.7
Vyacheslav Buteyets4186.5%4.29-5.0
Damian Clara3186.8%4.04-3.3

Full schedule · 72 regular + 2 playoff

RecentFull schedule
DateOppResultGoalsxG
2025-10-10@ CVW5–04.8–3.1
2025-10-18vs HSKL3–42.7–2.5
2025-10-22vs COLL0–22.9–2.7
2025-10-24@ HSKOTL2–32.8–3.2
2025-10-25@ HSKL2–53.3–4.3
2025-10-29vs SJW3–03.5–2.5
2025-10-30@ CVOTL3–44.1–1.6
2025-11-02vs COLL1–32.0–3.0
2025-11-05@ HSKW6–33.3–2.3
2025-11-07vs ONTW6–42.9–4.9
2025-11-08@ ONTOTL3–45.0–1.9
2025-11-14vs BAKW4–34.3–3.1
2025-11-15vs ABBW7–03.9–1.6
2025-11-19vs SJOTL4–52.3–2.7
2025-11-21@ CVOTL2–35.3–3.2
2025-11-22vs CGYL2–32.8–2.3
2025-11-26@ TUCW5–32.7–3.3
2025-11-28vs CVL0–53.2–2.2
2025-12-05vs TEXOTL2–32.0–1.7
2025-12-07vs TEXW5–13.7–1.7
2025-12-10@ SJW3–12.5–2.7
2025-12-12vs HSKW4–13.1–1.4
2025-12-13vs HSKOTL1–22.5–2.5
2025-12-16@ HSKL0–12.9–2.4
2025-12-19@ CGYW4–34.9–3.0
2025-12-21@ CGYL1–23.7–1.6
2025-12-27@ BAKW5–23.5–2.0
2025-12-28vs ABBW3–05.2–1.1
2025-12-31@ TUCW4–34.0–2.8
2026-01-02vs CVL2–51.6–2.1
2026-01-07vs SJOTL2–32.5–2.5
2026-01-09@ COLW5–43.0–4.5
2026-01-10@ COLL0–63.1–4.2
2026-01-14vs ABBL3–52.6–2.7
2026-01-16vs ABBW1–02.1–1.7
2026-01-17vs CVL0–42.3–2.9
2026-01-20@ TUCW3–23.8–2.3
2026-01-21@ TUCW5–34.9–2.6
2026-01-24@ ABBL1–32.2–2.0
2026-01-25@ ABBL0–42.9–2.9
2026-01-28vs TUCOTL3–42.5–1.8
2026-01-30@ CVW4–33.5–2.8
2026-01-31vs ONTW4–33.8–1.6
2026-02-04vs HSKW7–43.8–3.6
2026-02-13@ BAKW3–12.5–2.7
2026-02-14vs BAKL4–52.9–2.5
2026-02-18vs SJOTL3–44.7–2.2
2026-02-21@ RFDW5–42.8–1.9
2026-02-22@ RFDL1–22.1–2.8
2026-02-25vs TUCOTL1–21.9–2.3
2026-02-27@ TEXW2–12.0–2.1
2026-02-28@ TEXOTL5–62.0–3.1
2026-03-04@ SJL2–31.7–3.9
2026-03-06vs RFDL2–32.8–1.3
2026-03-07vs RFDW6–43.6–2.1
2026-03-11@ SJL1–42.7–3.1
2026-03-13vs COLL3–63.2–2.3
2026-03-14vs COLW2–12.3–2.8
2026-03-17@ COLW6–54.6–3.3
2026-03-18@ COLL1–52.3–3.8
2026-03-20vs BAKW7–42.3–1.4
2026-03-22vs CGYW5–42.8–1.1
2026-03-28@ ABBL2–53.9–2.7
2026-03-29@ ABBL3–52.6–2.4
2026-04-01vs TUCW3–03.0–2.2
2026-04-03vs BAKW6–33.1–2.4
2026-04-07@ SJW5–22.5–3.6
2026-04-10@ BAKL3–52.6–3.5
2026-04-11@ BAKW7–33.1–4.0
2026-04-15vs TUCL1–52.5–1.8
2026-04-17@ ONTL1–42.2–2.9
2026-04-18vs CVL4–61.5–3.2
2026-04-22@ COLPlayoffL0–31.6–2.9
2026-04-24@ COLPlayoffL1–62.2–3.1