AHLDashboard
HFDAtlantic Division · 8th of 8 · New York Rangers

Hartford WolfPack

XL Center, Hartford, CT

26-38-8
Record
60
Points
190
Goals for
253
Against
-63
Differential
At home11-19-690–118 (-28)
On the road15-19-2100–135 (-35)
Last 102-6-2 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality HFD were a middle club: 21st of 32 in creation, 20th of 32 in suppression.

They conceded 53 more than the chances against were worth (32nd of 32 in save percentage).

43% of their goals came off the rush, 7th of 32 — a club built on the first shot, not the cycle.

The power play was 28th of 32 at 14.8%.

Where HFD ranks

Expected Goals For % · 22 of 32
48.56%
xGF/60 · 21 of 32
2.59
xGA/60 · 20 of 32
2.74
Scoring Chance % · 23 of 32
47.73%
High Danger Chance % · 26 of 32
47.41%
Shooting % · 29 of 32
9.39%
Save % · 32 of 32
87.3%
PDO · 32 of 32
96.7%
Power Play % · 28 of 32
14.80%
Penalty Kill % · 16 of 32
81.20%
Special Teams Index · 27 of 32
96.00%
Rush Share of Goals · 7 of 32
43.2%
Goals For · 29 of 32
190
Goals Against · 30 of 32
253

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

HFD2,024 shots · 189 xG
quiet3.4 xG per 5 ft
Allowed1,999 shots · 200 xG
quiet3.4 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play3322314.8%
Penalty kill4725081.2%

Special-teams index 96.0 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period45.8%of goals scored
Goals
66–78
xG share
47.6%
2nd period44.2%of goals scored
Goals
68–86
xG share
49.2%
3rd period39.1%of goals scored
Goals
52–81
xG share
49.4%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for666852
Goals against788681
xG for58.468.859.4
xG against64.371.160.9
Shots for647683671
Shots against669689619

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush8243.2%10641.9%
Off the cycle8946.8%11545.5%
In a scramble189.5%2911.5%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush51216.0%54880.7%
Off the cycle14016.4%134791.5%
In a scramble11116.2%10472.1%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots20241999
Expected goals188.7199.9
Scoring chances684—
High-danger chances275—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading29%1,267 min67–5654.5%lg 52.8%51.7%lg 47.8%50.1%lg 48.1%47.3%lg 46.3%11.3%lg 10.4%90.6%lg 90.4%
Tied32%1,366 min47–7040.2%lg 50.0%40.2%lg 50.0%46.0%lg 50.0%48.0%lg 50.0%7.6%lg 9.6%89.6%lg 90.4%
Trailing39%1,687 min72–11937.7%lg 47.3%41.1%lg 52.2%49.8%lg 51.7%54.4%lg 53.9%8.5%lg 9.6%85.1%lg 89.5%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; HFD being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 34

PlayerGPGAPSOGixG
Trey Fix-WolanskyF7231245521422.30
Brendan BrissonF6619183711115.10
Derrick PouliotD6823234974.75
Adam SýkoraF6212172912015.49
Justin DowlingC4692029838.85
Dylan RoobroeckF7211152614113.05
Bryce McConnell-BarkerF691411259911.54
Jaroslav ChmelarF46817258010.19
Brennan OthmannF4091423777.82
Casey FitzgeraldD7141923974.90
Aidan ThompsonF5881422988.96
Brett BerardF416162212314.07
Scott MorrowD3451419925.50
Connor MackeyD62513181245.83
Carey TerranceF688917646.67
Gabe PerreaultF2010717344.22
Anton BlidhF64881610212.50
Brandon ScanlinD494711561.99
Jackson DorringtonD702911864.72
Brody LambF15459202.34
Blake HillmanD40268442.61
Daniel WalcottLW39448434.25
Cooper MooreD38167301.50
Juuso PärssinenC15527151.85
Kalle VäisänenF51314363.49
Zakary KarpaF24134201.65
Phip WaughD15033190.73
Travis DermottD503340.36
Kyle JacksonF1211250.50
Case McCarthyD901140.22
Chris OrtizD24011120.70
Caige SterzerF500010.15
Gavin HainC600020.29
Sullivan MackF400060.58

2025-26 goaltending

GoalieGPWSV%GAAGSAx
Dylan Garand361689.6%2.83-4.2
Spencer Martin22387.3%3.51-14.6
Callum Tung16785.5%3.94-16.8
Talyn Boyko5089.4%3.101.5

Full schedule · 72 regular

RecentFull schedule
DateOppResultGoalsxG
2025-10-11@ WBSL1–22.2–2.5
2025-10-17vs WBSL2–52.9–4.6
2025-10-18@ PROL2–52.4–2.2
2025-10-22vs SPRW3–03.6–3.1
2025-10-24vs BRIL0–33.0–4.1
2025-10-25@ SPRW6–34.0–1.4
2025-10-29vs CLTW4–12.4–2.1
2025-10-31vs LVOTL3–43.1–4.3
2025-11-01vs LVOTL3–42.2–3.1
2025-11-07@ LAVL2–42.6–3.0
2025-11-08@ BELL1–23.4–4.1
2025-11-12@ PROOTL2–32.7–3.8
2025-11-14vs ROCOTL3–41.9–3.0
2025-11-15vs LAVL2–52.8–3.2
2025-11-18vs SPRW3–22.8–1.8
2025-11-21vs WBSW5–22.3–2.5
2025-11-22vs LVL2–32.2–2.6
2025-11-26vs SPRL3–64.4–3.4
2025-11-28@ CLEW6–42.5–2.9
2025-11-29@ CLEW3–22.0–4.2
2025-12-05vs SPRW5–23.3–4.2
2025-12-06@ BRIL2–61.3–2.5
2025-12-10vs WBSL0–32.2–2.4
2025-12-12@ UTCW2–11.7–2.2
2025-12-13@ SYRL2–72.4–5.0
2025-12-19vs SYRL3–52.4–3.6
2025-12-20@ LVOTL1–22.5–2.3
2025-12-27@ BRIW5–22.2–2.3
2025-12-31vs BRIL0–42.2–2.5
2026-01-02vs PROL1–42.6–2.8
2026-01-03@ BRIW4–13.6–2.0
2026-01-09@ SPRL4–72.4–3.2
2026-01-10vs PROW5–14.1–2.4
2026-01-11@ BRIL1–53.0–3.7
2026-01-14@ HERW3–23.0–2.1
2026-01-16@ WBSW4–33.7–2.0
2026-01-17@ WBSL1–42.1–2.2
2026-01-20@ HERW5–44.7–2.6
2026-01-23vs BRIW3–22.0–2.2
2026-01-24vs TORL1–43.9–2.9
2026-01-28vs CLTL1–72.4–2.6
2026-01-30vs BRIL3–62.1–3.0
2026-01-31@ SPRL1–41.9–1.2
2026-02-06@ PROL1–32.6–3.4
2026-02-07vs PROOTL1–22.0–2.3
2026-02-14@ CLTW3–23.1–2.8
2026-02-16@ CLTL0–91.7–4.3
2026-02-20vs UTCL1–21.4–1.4
2026-02-21vs BELW4–03.1–1.4
2026-02-22@ PROW5–22.8–2.3
2026-02-28@ LVW5–42.2–2.0
2026-03-01@ LVL3–62.9–3.2
2026-03-04vs PROL2–34.5–2.1
2026-03-06vs BRIW6–02.7–1.8
2026-03-07vs HERW5–23.0–2.0
2026-03-11vs CLEL2–32.6–2.6
2026-03-13vs CLEL1–32.6–3.1
2026-03-14@ PROL0–70.9–3.4
2026-03-17@ CLTW5–22.9–2.9
2026-03-18@ CLTW5–22.4–1.9
2026-03-21@ TORL3–63.2–3.7
2026-03-22@ ROCL3–63.1–2.1
2026-03-28vs CLTOTL1–22.3–3.5
2026-03-29vs CLTOTL1–21.7–2.1
2026-04-03@ BRIL2–42.3–2.0
2026-04-04vs HERL1–82.0–3.2
2026-04-10vs PROL1–42.0–2.8
2026-04-11@ SPRW3–11.8–3.7
2026-04-12@ BRIL1–41.9–2.5
2026-04-15vs BRIL2–51.8–2.2
2026-04-17vs SPRW7–53.6–2.4
2026-04-18@ SPRL3–42.7–3.0