ABBPacific Division · 9th of 10 · Vancouver Canucks

AbbotsfordCanucks

Abbotsford Centre, Abbotsford, BC

28-37-7
Record: 63
Points: 173
Goals for: 234
Against: -61
Differential

At home16-17-390–114 (-24)

On the road12-20-483–120 (-37)

Last 106-3-1 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality ABB were a middle club: 23rd of 32 in creation, 19th of 32 in suppression.

They finished 14 goals below what the chances were worth (30th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 35 more than the chances against were worth (18th of 32 in save percentage).

The penalty kill 30th of 32 at 76.6%.

Where ABB ranks

Expected Goals For % · 23 of 32

48.42%

xGF/60 · 23 of 32

2.55

xGA/60 · 19 of 32

2.71

Scoring Chance % · 18 of 32

49.28%

High Danger Chance % · 14 of 32

49.22%

Shooting % · 30 of 32

9.19%

Save % · 18 of 32

89.0%

PDO · 28 of 32

98.2%

Power Play % · 13 of 32

19.48%

Penalty Kill % · 30 of 32

76.59%

Special Teams Index · 26 of 32

96.07%

Rush Share of Goals · 18 of 32

39.9%

Goals For · 32 of 32

173

Goals Against · 23 of 32

234

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

ABB1,882 shots · 187 xG

quiet3.7 xG per 5 ft

Allowed2,130 shots · 199 xG

quiet3.7 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

	Goals	Chances	Rate
Power play	45	231	19.5%
Penalty kill	48	205	76.6%

Special-teams index 96.1 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period41.0%of goals scored

Goals: 41–59
xG share: 48.2%

2nd period45.5%of goals scored

Goals: 56–67
xG share: 47.5%

3rd period40.2%of goals scored

Goals: 68–101
xG share: 49.3%

	1st	2nd	3rd
Goals for	41	56	68
Goals against	59	67	101
xG for	60.2	63.2	60.4
xG against	64.7	69.8	62.1
Shots for	623	609	626
Shots against	707	741	654

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

Goals	For	Share	Against	Share
Off the rush	69	39.9%	85	36.3%
Off the cycle	76	43.9%	115	49.1%
In a scramble	23	13.3%	31	13.2%

Attempts	For	Sh%	Against	Sv%
Off the rush	501	13.8%	506	83.2%
Off the cycle	1251	6.1%	1488	92.3%
In a scramble	130	17.7%	136	77.2%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

	For	Against
Shots	1882	2130
Expected goals	186.7	198.8
Scoring chances	687	—
High-danger chances	283	—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score state	Share of play	GF–GA	GF%	GF% ex. EN	xGF%	SF%	Sh%ex. EN	Sv%ex. EN
Leading	26%1,130 min	41–53	43.6%lg 52.9%	40.4%lg 47.8%	42.6%lg 48.0%	39.7%lg 46.5%	9.3%lg 10.4%	91.1%lg 90.3%
Tied	34%1,490 min	57–73	43.8%lg 50.0%	43.8%lg 50.0%	49.6%lg 50.0%	47.9%lg 50.0%	8.3%lg 9.6%	90.2%lg 90.4%
Trailing	39%1,700 min	67–101	39.9%lg 47.5%	44.1%lg 52.1%	50.7%lg 51.9%	50.7%lg 53.6%	8.6%lg 9.6%	88.6%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; ABB being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 46

Player	GP	G	A	P	SOG	ixG
Nils ÅmanC	55	6	35	41	83	11.49
Ben BerardLW	63	20	17	37	122	14.26
Ty MuellerC	61	16	21	37	115	15.79
Danila KlimovichRW	63	18	16	34	171	19.20
Chase WoutersC	70	11	15	26	116	15.77
Jack ThompsonD	56	6	19	25	106	3.90
Arshdeep BainsLW	34	11	13	24	82	11.80
Sawyer MynioD	58	3	18	21	81	4.22
Jonathan LekkerimäkiRW	21	13	7	20	73	7.68
Kirill KudryavtsevD	44	2	18	20	57	2.60
Lukas ReichelC	27	7	12	19	39	5.01
Jimmy SchuldtD	70	3	15	18	119	4.75
Victor ManciniD	33	4	8	12	52	2.54
Bennett SchimekRW	13	5	6	11	29	3.36
Cole ClaytonD	65	2	9	11	56	2.15
Nick PoissonC	43	5	6	11	44	4.06
Dino KambeitzRW	64	2	8	10	67	6.74
Jett WooD	43	2	8	10	62	2.67
Joseph LaBateC	23	6	4	10	47	6.19
Chase StillmanRW	24	3	6	9	32	3.51
Jujhar KhairaC	42	3	6	9	40	5.58
Vilmer AlrikssonLW	43	6	3	9	59	8.06
Mackenzie MacEachernLW	21	6	2	8	41	5.04
Joe ArntsenD	64	3	4	7	35	1.58
Nikolai KnyzhovD	60	0	7	7	43	1.82
Cooper WalkerC	37	2	4	6	33	3.00
Anri RavinskisLW	32	2	2	4	40	4.32
Vitali KravtsovRW	10	1	3	4	22	1.86
Arnaud DurandeauLW	19	0	3	3	22	2.33
Jackson KunzC	22	0	3	3	18	2.20
Josh BloomLW	22	2	1	3	19	2.43
Phip WaughD	15	0	3	3	19	0.73
Guillaume BriseboisD	9	1	1	2	12	1.01
Max SassonC	2	2	0	2	9	1.30
Riley PattersonC	4	1	1	2	8	0.59
Tom WillanderD	5	1	1	2	6	0.40
Austin BrimmerRW	13	0	1	1	13	1.49
Braden BirnieLW	5	0	1	1	3	0.55
Derek DaschkeD	13	0	1	1	4	0.12
Jayden GrubbeC	2	1	0	1	4	0.34
Robby DraznerD	2	0	1	1	2	0.15
Christian FeltonD	14	0	0	0	10	0.57
Elias PetterssonD	3	0	0	0	3	0.21
Jake MurrayD	2	0	0	0	3	0.07
Jayden LeeD	3	0	0	0	3	0.09
Zach OkabeC	2	0	0	0	0	—

2025-26 goaltending

Goalie	GP	W	SV%	GAA	GSAx
Jiří Patera	30	12	91.0%	2.63	3.4
Nikita Tolopilo	19	8	89.7%	3.07	-4.7
Ty Young	17	6	88.4%	3.36	-11.5
Aku Koskenvuo	9	2	89.5%	3.20	-1.9
Jonathan Lemieux	2	0	90.2%	2.82	-0.4
C.J. Kier	1	0	71.4%	6.00	-1.1

Full schedule · 72 regular

Recent Full schedule

Date	Opp	Result	Goals	xG
2025-10-10	@ HSK	W	2–1	2.8–3.5
2025-10-11	@ HSK	W	4–2	3.4–2.7
2025-10-17	@ LAV	L	0–3	2.4–2.4
2025-10-18	@ LAV	L	2–5	1.8–4.0
2025-10-24	vs ONT	L	2–5	2.4–2.5
2025-10-26	vs ONT	L	2–5	1.3–3.0
2025-10-28	vs CGY	L	0–3	3.4–2.2
2025-10-29	vs CGY	OTL	1–2	2.4–2.3
2025-11-01	vs HSK	L	1–6	2.0–3.5
2025-11-02	vs HSK	L	3–7	2.3–4.7
2025-11-07	@ COL	L	1–4	1.2–2.9
2025-11-08	@ COL	OTL	2–3	2.5–2.0
2025-11-11	vs SJ	L	0–7	2.4–3.9
2025-11-12	vs SJ	W	4–3	3.0–3.3
2025-11-15	@ SD	L	0–7	1.6–3.9
2025-11-16	@ CV	L	2–5	1.5–2.4
2025-11-21	@ SJ	L	3–5	2.4–3.2
2025-11-22	@ SJ	OTL	3–4	2.3–3.7
2025-11-28	@ TUC	L	1–4	3.2–2.5
2025-11-29	@ TUC	W	5–2	3.7–1.8
2025-12-02	vs CGY	L	2–3	3.3–2.2
2025-12-03	vs CGY	W	2–1	3.5–1.9
2025-12-06	vs CV	OTL	3–4	1.9–4.1
2025-12-07	vs CV	L	1–2	2.6–2.5
2025-12-13	@ CGY	W	3–2	3.6–2.0
2025-12-14	@ CGY	OTL	3–4	3.2–2.4
2025-12-19	vs TUC	W	4–2	2.7–3.8
2025-12-20	vs TUC	W	2–1	1.4–1.9
2025-12-27	@ CV	OTL	2–3	3.5–3.0
2025-12-28	@ SD	L	0–3	1.1–5.2
2025-12-31	@ MB	W	5–2	3.0–2.5
2026-01-02	@ MB	L	1–4	2.8–2.7
2026-01-06	vs BAK	L	3–5	3.2–1.4
2026-01-07	vs BAK	L	1–4	2.5–2.0
2026-01-10	vs CGY	W	4–3	3.0–2.7
2026-01-11	vs CGY	W	3–2	1.8–1.9
2026-01-14	@ SD	W	5–3	2.7–2.6
2026-01-16	@ SD	L	0–1	1.7–2.1
2026-01-18	@ CV	L	0–3	1.9–2.3
2026-01-20	vs LAV	L	3–4	3.9–2.3
2026-01-21	vs LAV	W	2–1	1.8–2.0
2026-01-24	vs SD	W	3–1	2.0–2.2
2026-01-25	vs SD	W	4–0	2.9–2.9
2026-01-28	@ ONT	L	2–5	2.5–2.0
2026-01-30	@ BAK	L	2–7	4.1–4.7
2026-01-31	@ BAK	L	2–3	5.3–2.8
2026-02-06	vs SJ	L	3–7	3.0–2.1
2026-02-07	vs SJ	W	2–1	2.5–3.4
2026-02-14	vs ONT	W	2–1	1.2–3.2
2026-02-16	vs ONT	W	5–3	3.0–2.9
2026-02-18	@ ONT	L	2–4	2.3–2.8
2026-02-20	@ HSK	L	3–6	2.4–2.8
2026-02-21	@ HSK	L	3–4	4.3–3.4
2026-02-27	@ CGY	W	3–2	4.0–2.7
2026-03-01	@ CGY	W	3–2	1.7–2.6
2026-03-06	vs COL	L	2–5	1.3–4.0
2026-03-07	vs COL	W	4–0	2.6–1.6
2026-03-10	vs MB	L	0–4	1.9–2.8
2026-03-11	vs MB	W	4–1	2.1–1.7
2026-03-14	vs HSK	L	1–4	3.0–2.0
2026-03-15	vs HSK	L	5–7	3.9–2.1
2026-03-18	@ ONT	L	1–3	1.7–2.7
2026-03-21	@ SJ	L	1–4	2.3–2.9
2026-03-22	@ SJ	L	2–4	2.1–3.0
2026-03-28	vs SD	W	5–2	2.7–3.9
2026-03-29	vs SD	W	5–3	2.4–2.6
2026-04-03	vs CV	L	0–2	1.7–3.4
2026-04-04	vs CV	OTL	2–3	2.2–2.5
2026-04-10	@ CGY	W	5–4	5.0–2.8
2026-04-11	@ CGY	W	4–0	1.7–1.6
2026-04-18	@ ONT	W	2–0	2.0–2.5
2026-04-19	@ CV	W	4–2	3.5–2.8