TEXCentral Division · 3rd of 7 · Dallas Stars

TexasStars

H-E-B Center at Cedar Park, Cedar Park, TX

37-29-6
Record: 80
Points: 222
Goals for: 228
Against: -6
Differential

At home19-15-2112–111 (+1)

On the road18-14-4110–117 (-7)

Last 105-3-2 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality TEX were a middle club: 25th of 32 in creation, 23rd of 32 in suppression.

They finished 36 goals above what the chances were worth (9th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 23 more than the chances against were worth (12th of 32 in save percentage).

Only 32% of their goals came off the rush, 32nd of 32 — the offence was built on the cycle and the point.

The power play was 30th of 32 at 14.0% and the penalty kill 26th of 32 at 79.6%.

Where TEX ranks

Expected Goals For % · 26 of 32

47.55%

xGF/60 · 25 of 32

2.54

xGA/60 · 23 of 32

2.80

Scoring Chance % · 27 of 32

47.04%

High Danger Chance % · 12 of 32

49.66%

Shooting % · 9 of 32

11.47%

Save % · 12 of 32

89.4%

PDO · 9 of 32

100.9%

Power Play % · 30 of 32

14.04%

Penalty Kill % · 26 of 32

79.57%

Special Teams Index · 29 of 32

93.61%

Rush Share of Goals · 32 of 32

32.0%

Goals For · 18 of 32

222

Goals Against · 18 of 32

228

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

TEX1,935 shots · 186 xG

quiet3.2 xG per 5 ft

Allowed2,157 shots · 205 xG

quiet3.2 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

	Goals	Chances	Rate
Power play	33	235	14.0%
Penalty kill	47	230	79.6%

Special-teams index 93.6 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period50.0%of goals scored

Goals: 60–60
xG share: 46.6%

2nd period51.9%of goals scored

Goals: 69–64
xG share: 46.7%

3rd period46.2%of goals scored

Goals: 84–98
xG share: 48.6%

	1st	2nd	3rd
Goals for	60	69	84
Goals against	60	64	98
xG for	55.1	63.4	62.7
xG against	63.3	72.4	66.3
Shots for	608	665	633
Shots against	713	731	688

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

Goals	For	Share	Against	Share
Off the rush	71	32.0%	97	42.5%
Off the cycle	115	51.8%	100	43.9%
In a scramble	32	14.4%	29	12.7%

Attempts	For	Sh%	Against	Sv%
Off the rush	453	15.7%	504	80.8%
Off the cycle	1365	8.4%	1497	93.3%
In a scramble	117	27.4%	156	81.4%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

	For	Against
Shots	1935	2157
Expected goals	185.7	204.8
Scoring chances	644	—
High-danger chances	292	—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score state	Share of play	GF–GA	GF%	GF% ex. EN	xGF%	SF%	Sh%ex. EN	Sv%ex. EN
Leading	33%1,539 min	69–75	47.9%lg 52.5%	40.0%lg 47.9%	45.4%lg 48.0%	43.6%lg 46.6%	8.3%lg 10.4%	90.6%lg 90.4%
Tied	33%1,541 min	75–73	50.7%lg 50.0%	50.7%lg 50.0%	48.2%lg 50.0%	48.0%lg 50.0%	10.8%lg 9.6%	90.3%lg 90.4%
Trailing	33%1,540 min	81–90	47.4%lg 47.4%	54.4%lg 52.1%	49.6%lg 52.0%	51.0%lg 53.4%	11.1%lg 9.6%	90.0%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; TEX being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 37

Player	GP	G	A	P	SOG	ixG
Cameron HughesF	65	17	51	68	149	16.37
Matthew SeminoffF	72	24	26	50	153	17.96
Jack BeckerF	71	14	26	40	118	14.45
Artem ShlaineF	67	19	19	38	118	14.90
Cross HanasF	56	15	23	38	96	9.51
Kole LindF	70	11	24	35	130	12.96
Antonio StrangesF	70	14	20	34	137	15.02
Christian KyrouD	59	10	24	34	93	6.21
Harrison ScottF	72	18	14	32	122	15.04
Curtis McKenzieF	72	11	18	29	81	9.93
Michael KarowD	68	10	18	28	78	3.65
Trey TaylorD	70	8	18	26	95	5.72
Tristan BertucciD	63	5	19	24	77	4.48
Arttu HyryC	27	9	10	19	61	7.34
Jérémie PoirierD	51	5	11	16	88	4.58
Luke KrysD	40	7	9	16	50	2.58
Ayrton MartinoF	41	2	10	12	29	3.96
Gavin WhiteD	51	3	9	12	97	4.03
Kyle McDonaldRW	29	3	8	11	36	3.73
Samu TuomaalaF	19	2	8	10	35	3.38
Kyle LooftD	37	4	5	9	42	2.12
Vladislav KolyachonokD	34	1	8	9	42	2.02
Justin ErtelLW	44	2	5	7	29	2.46
Dylan HryckowianF	12	3	3	6	21	2.56
Sean ChisholmF	51	3	3	6	52	5.46
Tommy BergslandD	34	1	5	6	35	1.23
Kyle CapobiancoD	5	1	3	4	7	0.40
Aram MinnetianD	8	0	3	3	6	0.36
Ellis RickwoodF	2	2	1	3	3	0.57
Jack AndersonD	12	2	1	3	12	0.49
Nathan BastianRW	4	2	1	3	10	1.02
Connor PunnettD	18	0	2	2	12	0.35
Aidan HreschukD	3	0	1	1	0	—
Kaleb PearsonF	5	1	0	1	2	0.14
Chase WheatcroftF	8	0	0	0	6	0.65
Christian FitzgeraldF	2	0	0	0	5	0.59
Emil HemmingF	5	0	0	0	8	0.67

2025-26 goaltending

Goalie	GP	W	SV%	GAA	GSAx
Rémi Poirier	52	27	91.2%	2.61	9.5
Arno Tiefensee	20	10	89.2%	3.30	-6.3
Ben Kraws	4	0	84.0%	4.34	-4.6

Full schedule · 72 regular + 5 playoff

Recent Full schedule

Date	Opp	Result	Goals	xG
2025-10-10	vs GR	L	3–4	3.3–2.8
2025-10-11	vs GR	L	2–3	3.3–3.2
2025-10-17	@ RFD	OTL	1–2	2.6–1.8
2025-10-18	@ MIL	L	3–5	2.3–2.7
2025-10-24	vs IA	L	1–3	0.8–3.2
2025-10-25	vs IA	L	0–2	1.7–2.2
2025-11-02	@ MB	W	2–1	2.4–1.4
2025-11-03	@ MB	W	3–0	2.5–2.0
2025-11-07	vs MB	W	4–1	2.0–1.7
2025-11-08	vs MB	L	2–3	3.1–3.6
2025-11-15	@ MIL	L	1–3	1.3–2.2
2025-11-16	@ RFD	W	3–2	2.6–2.8
2025-11-18	@ IA	L	1–3	1.8–2.3
2025-11-21	vs RFD	OTL	3–4	2.0–2.8
2025-11-22	vs RFD	W	5–2	2.6–2.6
2025-11-25	vs GR	L	1–10	1.2–3.8
2025-11-26	vs GR	L	3–6	1.6–2.0
2025-11-29	@ CV	W	5–3	2.3–3.0
2025-11-30	@ ONT	W	4–1	2.1–1.9
2025-12-03	@ CV	OTL	2–3	2.0–3.6
2025-12-05	@ SD	W	3–2	1.7–2.0
2025-12-07	@ SD	L	1–5	1.7–3.7
2025-12-09	@ ONT	L	3–6	2.1–2.6
2025-12-12	vs SJ	L	2–3	2.3–2.3
2025-12-13	vs SJ	OTL	3–4	3.3–3.9
2025-12-19	vs MIL	W	3–2	3.5–2.2
2025-12-20	vs MIL	W	5–2	2.7–2.1
2025-12-27	@ RFD	L	4–8	3.0–3.4
2025-12-30	@ IA	L	1–4	3.7–2.5
2025-12-31	@ IA	W	3–2	2.7–3.8
2026-01-03	vs MIL	W	4–3	3.3–3.1
2026-01-04	vs MIL	W	4–1	1.4–4.8
2026-01-07	@ GR	L	2–3	1.7–4.3
2026-01-09	@ GR	W	2–0	2.6–2.1
2026-01-10	@ CHI	W	3–1	2.8–3.0
2026-01-13	vs CV	L	2–5	2.2–3.4
2026-01-14	vs CV	L	3–6	1.9–3.6
2026-01-17	vs ONT	L	3–4	2.3–2.8
2026-01-18	vs ONT	W	3–1	1.6–2.5
2026-01-21	@ IA	W	6–4	3.1–2.6
2026-01-23	@ RFD	W	5–0	4.1–1.8
2026-01-30	vs HSK	W	6–5	3.6–3.4
2026-01-31	vs HSK	W	3–1	1.6–3.0
2026-02-06	vs MB	W	2–1	1.8–1.9
2026-02-07	vs MB	W	4–3	1.7–2.9
2026-02-13	@ GR	L	2–4	2.6–2.2
2026-02-15	@ GR	L	0–5	1.8–2.5
2026-02-18	@ MIL	W	4–3	3.3–2.3
2026-02-20	@ MIL	W	5–2	2.6–2.8
2026-02-21	@ CHI	L	4–5	2.1–3.7
2026-02-27	vs SD	L	1–2	2.1–2.0
2026-02-28	vs SD	W	6–5	3.1–2.0
2026-03-07	@ CHI	W	4–2	4.2–3.0
2026-03-08	@ CHI	W	7–6	4.8–3.3
2026-03-13	vs BAK	L	1–4	2.8–2.3
2026-03-14	vs BAK	W	6–2	4.0–3.2
2026-03-17	vs CHI	W	2–1	2.6–1.3
2026-03-18	vs CHI	W	5–4	3.2–3.0
2026-03-21	@ HSK	W	6–3	2.5–5.6
2026-03-22	@ HSK	L	2–7	1.6–4.1
2026-03-25	@ SJ	W	3–2	3.4–3.1
2026-03-27	@ BAK	L	3–4	1.9–5.5
2026-03-28	@ BAK	L	3–6	2.3–3.8
2026-03-31	@ SJ	W	2–1	2.5–3.7
2026-04-03	vs CHI	W	3–1	1.5–3.3
2026-04-04	vs CHI	W	4–2	2.9–1.4
2026-04-07	vs IA	L	2–5	2.7–2.2
2026-04-08	vs IA	L	0–4	2.5–2.7
2026-04-10	@ MB	OTL	4–5	4.4–3.0
2026-04-12	@ MB	OTL	3–4	3.2–4.3
2026-04-17	vs RFD	W	6–1	4.1–2.1
2026-04-18	vs RFD	W	5–1	4.9–1.3
2026-04-28	vs CHIPlayoff	W	2–0	2.5–1.0
2026-04-30	vs CHIPlayoff	OTL	4–5	2.7–2.5
2026-05-02	@ CHIPlayoff	L	1–2	2.0–2.5
2026-05-03	@ CHIPlayoff	W	5–4	4.2–2.5
2026-05-05	@ CHIPlayoff	L	1–6	1.9–2.7