BELNorth Division · 7th of 7 · Ottawa Senators

BellevilleSenators

CAA Arena, Belleville, ON

28-35-9
Record: 65
Points: 223
Goals for: 262
Against: -39
Differential

At home13-19-4114–127 (-13)

On the road15-16-5109–135 (-26)

Last 104-6-0 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality BEL were a middle club: 24th of 32 in creation, 28th of 32 in suppression.

They finished 37 goals above what the chances were worth (7th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 48 more than the chances against were worth (29th of 32 in save percentage).

The penalty kill 27th of 32 at 78.6%.

Where BEL ranks

Expected Goals For % · 30 of 32

46.47%

xGF/60 · 24 of 32

2.54

xGA/60 · 28 of 32

2.92

Scoring Chance % · 29 of 32

46.68%

High Danger Chance % · 30 of 32

46.59%

Shooting % · 7 of 32

11.88%

Save % · 29 of 32

88.1%

PDO · 16 of 32

100.0%

Power Play % · 16 of 32

18.22%

Penalty Kill % · 27 of 32

78.60%

Special Teams Index · 23 of 32

96.82%

Rush Share of Goals · 15 of 32

40.8%

Goals For · 17 of 32

223

Goals Against · 31 of 32

262

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

BEL1,877 shots · 186 xG

quiet4.1 xG per 5 ft

Allowed2,197 shots · 214 xG

quiet4.1 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

	Goals	Chances	Rate
Power play	45	247	18.2%
Penalty kill	52	243	78.6%

Special-teams index 96.8 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period48.3%of goals scored

Goals: 69–74
xG share: 47.1%

2nd period39.1%of goals scored

Goals: 61–95
xG share: 41.4%

3rd period50.6%of goals scored

Goals: 86–84
xG share: 51.5%

	1st	2nd	3rd
Goals for	69	61	86
Goals against	74	95	84
xG for	56.8	60.5	64.9
xG against	63.9	85.8	61.2
Shots for	607	606	638
Shots against	734	784	644

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

Goals	For	Share	Against	Share
Off the rush	91	40.8%	105	40.1%
Off the cycle	102	45.7%	120	45.8%
In a scramble	27	12.1%	36	13.7%

Attempts	For	Sh%	Against	Sv%
Off the rush	489	18.6%	534	80.3%
Off the cycle	1296	7.9%	1511	92.1%
In a scramble	92	29.3%	152	76.3%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

	For	Against
Shots	1877	2197
Expected goals	186.0	214.2
Scoring chances	688	—
High-danger chances	273	—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score state	Share of play	GF–GA	GF%	GF% ex. EN	xGF%	SF%	Sh%ex. EN	Sv%ex. EN
Leading	25%1,091 min	74–59	55.6%lg 52.8%	51.2%lg 47.8%	48.2%lg 48.1%	44.5%lg 46.3%	13.2%lg 10.5%	90.2%lg 90.4%
Tied	32%1,370 min	47–80	37.0%lg 50.0%	37.0%lg 50.0%	43.9%lg 50.0%	44.3%lg 50.0%	8.7%lg 9.6%	88.3%lg 90.4%
Trailing	43%1,859 min	95–114	45.5%lg 47.4%	49.0%lg 52.1%	46.9%lg 51.8%	48.5%lg 53.7%	11.5%lg 9.6%	88.5%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; BEL being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 36

Player	GP	G	A	P	SOG	ixG
Arthur KaliyevF	70	40	28	68	266	32.34
Xavier BourgaultRW	70	25	32	57	181	23.68
Philippe DaoustC	63	14	36	50	82	10.56
Graeme ClarkeRW	65	20	23	43	172	18.33
Carter YakemchukD	54	10	30	40	107	6.66
Garrett PilonC	56	8	23	31	67	6.27
Samuel BolducD	68	6	25	31	116	5.82
Olle LycksellRW	44	13	17	30	109	13.16
Wyatt BongiovanniC	65	15	15	30	115	11.19
Stephen HallidayC	29	2	27	29	64	5.63
Tyler BoucherRW	47	12	14	26	80	10.14
Lassi ThomsonD	55	14	11	25	116	6.88
Jorian DonovanD	61	4	17	21	47	2.27
Scott HarringtonD	68	3	16	19	53	2.21
Oskar PetterssonRW	69	9	9	18	67	6.32
Jamieson ReesLW	61	5	12	17	62	7.40
Jan JeníkC	43	9	8	17	63	7.48
Keean WashkurakC	62	9	8	17	48	5.58
Dennis GilbertD	37	0	13	13	22	0.98
Landen HookeyC	49	5	7	12	36	4.06
Hayden HodgsonRW	47	6	5	11	46	5.28
Cameron CrottyD	49	3	7	10	37	1.57
Mark DuarteRW	40	4	4	8	34	3.70
Tomas HamaraD	48	4	2	6	41	2.58
Djibril TouréD	38	1	3	4	33	1.18
Riley KidneyC	11	0	3	3	8	1.02
Ryan O’RourkeD	22	0	3	3	26	0.67
Blake MontgomeryLW	3	1	0	1	7	1.03
Hoyt StanleyD	6	1	0	1	3	0.34
Jake ChiassonRW	20	0	1	1	12	0.85
Danny KaticLW	4	0	0	0	3	0.28
Luke MistelbacherRW	3	0	0	0	2	0.14
Matthew AndonovskiD	3	0	0	0	0	—
Nathan BrownC	1	0	0	0	0	—
Riley McCourtD	2	0	0	0	1	0.02
Sam SedleyD	2	0	0	0	1	0.02

2025-26 goaltending

Goalie	GP	W	SV%	GAA	GSAx
Mads Søgaard	27	7	87.4%	3.69	-22.5
Hunter Shepard	19	7	88.7%	3.42	-7.1
Leevi Meriläinen	19	8	90.9%	2.77	1.9
Jackson Parsons	14	6	89.3%	3.22	-0.3
Kevin Reidler	2	1	87.7%	3.50	-2.4
James Reimer	1	0	78.6%	6.05	-2.1
Kaidan Mbereko	1	0	87.9%	4.00	0.4

Full schedule · 72 regular

Recent Full schedule

Date	Opp	Result	Goals	xG
2025-10-11	@ LV	L	2–5	2.9–1.5
2025-10-12	@ BRI	L	2–6	2.4–2.9
2025-10-18	vs TOR	OTL	1–2	1.9–2.5
2025-10-19	vs SYR	L	3–5	2.0–4.4
2025-10-22	vs LAV	W	6–2	2.2–2.3
2025-10-25	@ TOR	W	4–2	1.9–2.9
2025-10-26	@ TOR	W	5–4	2.7–2.9
2025-10-29	vs ROC	L	1–4	2.2–4.0
2025-11-01	@ SYR	W	7–4	2.6–4.9
2025-11-07	@ UTC	L	0–3	2.0–4.8
2025-11-08	vs HFD	W	2–1	4.1–3.4
2025-11-09	vs LAV	L	2–3	1.8–3.9
2025-11-12	@ ROC	W	6–4	1.7–3.5
2025-11-14	@ UTC	W	4–3	2.8–3.1
2025-11-15	@ SYR	W	4–1	1.7–3.8
2025-11-19	vs TOR	W	4–0	3.9–1.9
2025-11-21	@ LAV	OTL	3–4	2.2–3.8
2025-11-22	@ LAV	L	2–7	1.5–5.2
2025-11-25	@ MB	W	5–2	4.3–2.9
2025-11-26	@ MB	L	1–5	2.0–5.3
2025-11-29	vs PRO	L	3–6	2.4–2.3
2025-11-30	vs PRO	L	4–6	2.5–3.5
2025-12-03	vs TOR	L	3–4	2.1–3.1
2025-12-05	vs LAV	L	2–5	1.8–3.0
2025-12-06	vs LAV	W	4–3	2.8–2.6
2025-12-10	vs ROC	L	1–6	2.6–3.6
2025-12-13	vs CLE	L	1–4	1.2–2.8
2025-12-14	vs BRI	OTL	3–4	2.5–2.1
2025-12-19	@ ROC	OTL	2–3	1.9–3.0
2025-12-20	@ TOR	OTL	3–4	2.2–2.2
2025-12-21	vs TOR	W	8–4	4.0–1.9
2025-12-26	@ TOR	L	2–3	2.1–3.0
2025-12-28	vs UTC	W	7–0	2.5–2.2
2025-12-31	vs LAV	L	3–4	3.5–3.4
2026-01-03	vs LV	L	1–3	1.9–2.6
2026-01-09	@ TOR	L	1–6	1.5–2.5
2026-01-10	vs TOR	W	6–3	3.8–2.6
2026-01-11	vs ROC	OTL	5–6	2.7–3.9
2026-01-14	@ LAV	W	3–2	3.5–2.2
2026-01-16	vs ROC	W	5–4	3.8–3.3
2026-01-18	vs UTC	W	5–4	2.7–2.1
2026-01-21	@ WBS	W	3–2	2.0–2.7
2026-01-23	@ PRO	OTL	1–2	2.2–2.4
2026-01-24	@ SPR	W	1–0	2.2–3.0
2026-01-30	@ CLE	L	5–6	3.7–3.3
2026-01-31	@ CLE	OTL	5–6	2.6–4.3
2026-02-04	@ ROC	W	3–1	2.5–1.7
2026-02-06	@ SYR	L	3–5	2.8–2.7
2026-02-07	vs SYR	L	2–5	2.7–1.7
2026-02-14	vs HER	L	3–6	4.6–2.6
2026-02-16	vs HER	W	3–1	2.5–2.7
2026-02-18	vs SYR	L	1–2	2.3–2.8
2026-02-20	@ PRO	L	2–5	2.9–3.6
2026-02-21	@ HFD	L	0–4	1.4–3.1
2026-02-27	@ UTC	L	3–5	2.4–2.1
2026-02-28	vs UTC	L	1–5	2.4–3.8
2026-03-06	@ UTC	L	2–5	1.1–2.0
2026-03-07	vs UTC	W	7–3	3.6–2.6
2026-03-14	@ HER	W	6–3	2.4–1.6
2026-03-15	@ HER	W	5–2	4.0–3.1
2026-03-18	vs CLE	L	2–7	3.6–3.2
2026-03-20	vs WBS	OTL	1–2	2.7–1.7
2026-03-21	vs SPR	L	3–5	2.6–2.4
2026-03-27	vs MB	W	5–0	2.9–2.1
2026-03-28	vs MB	L	0–1	3.8–3.8
2026-04-03	@ ROC	W	5–2	1.8–3.2
2026-04-04	@ UTC	L	0–4	1.3–1.8
2026-04-10	@ LAV	W	7–6	5.9–4.6
2026-04-11	@ LAV	L	2–5	1.4–2.6
2026-04-15	vs UTC	L	0–3	2.1–2.1
2026-04-17	vs SYR	W	6–4	3.4–2.5
2026-04-18	@ SYR	L	0–4	1.5–4.4