AHLDashboard
CHICentral Division · 2nd of 7

ChicagoWolves

Allstate Arena, Rosemont, IL

36-21-15
Record
87
Points
225
Goals for
218
Against
+7
Differential
At home20-10-6107–104 (+3)
On the road16-11-9118–114 (+4)
Last 106-2-2 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality CHI were a middle club: 17th of 32 in creation, 27th of 32 in suppression.

They finished 27 goals above what the chances were worth (15th of 32 in shooting).

45% of their goals came off the rush, 4th of 32 — a club built on the first shot, not the cycle.

The penalty kill 8th of 32 at 83.3%.

Where CHI ranks

Expected Goals For % · 24 of 32
48.23%
xGF/60 · 17 of 32
2.68
xGA/60 · 27 of 32
2.87
Scoring Chance % · 21 of 32
48.52%
High Danger Chance % · 29 of 32
46.83%
Shooting % · 15 of 32
11.04%
Save % · 9 of 32
89.5%
PDO · 13 of 32
100.6%
Power Play % · 19 of 32
18.03%
Penalty Kill % · 8 of 32
83.28%
Special Teams Index · 13 of 32
101.32%
Rush Share of Goals · 4 of 32
44.9%
Goals For · 15 of 32
225
Goals Against · 10 of 32
218

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

CHI2,038 shots · 198 xG
quiet3.6 xG per 5 ft
Allowed2,085 shots · 213 xG
quiet3.6 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play5530518.0%
Penalty kill5532983.3%

Special-teams index 101.3 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period51.9%of goals scored
Goals
68–63
xG share
48.2%
2nd period50.3%of goals scored
Goals
76–75
xG share
50.0%
3rd period52.6%of goals scored
Goals
72–65
xG share
46.2%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for687672
Goals against637565
xG for59.774.956.9
xG against64.274.966.3
Shots for654738603
Shots against691693656

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush10144.9%9242.2%
Off the cycle9642.7%8840.4%
In a scramble2410.7%3114.2%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush53318.9%54683.2%
Off the cycle13916.9%139993.7%
In a scramble11421.1%14077.9%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots20382085
Expected goals198.0212.6
Scoring chances723—
High-danger chances318—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading33%1,841 min84–10544.4%lg 52.5%40.7%lg 47.9%42.0%lg 48.0%41.5%lg 46.6%10.2%lg 10.4%89.6%lg 90.4%
Tied38%2,109 min96–8353.6%lg 50.0%53.6%lg 50.0%48.9%lg 50.0%49.2%lg 50.0%9.9%lg 9.6%91.7%lg 90.4%
Trailing29%1,630 min94–7555.6%lg 47.4%61.0%lg 52.1%50.3%lg 52.0%54.8%lg 53.4%11.3%lg 9.6%91.1%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; CHI being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 31

PlayerGPGAPSOGixG
Felix Unger SörumRW7217496611613.33
Justin RobidasC5823376019122.32
Bradly NadeauLW5227295615419.34
Ryan SuzukiC6613354810414.70
Domenick FensoreD601025351618.62
Evan VierlingF7016193510012.54
Noel GunlerRW7115203512011.79
Skyler Brind’AmourF6816183411014.36
Nikita PavlychevC6914142811513.37
Gavin BayreutherD63520251215.79
Josiah SlavinLW6961925719.23
Viktor NeuchevRW6410152510312.15
Juuso VälimäkiD2771623472.44
Ronan SeeleyD69111223996.79
Cal FooteD4841418613.22
Aleksi HeimosalmiD5241317582.26
Noah PhilpC298917434.95
Dominik BadinkaD686814784.82
Gleb TrikozovLW467411615.02
Ivan RyabkinC311910384.22
Joel NyströmD371910482.36
Charles Alexis LegaultD24358341.34
Givani SmithLW25235353.67
Bryce MontgomeryD24044250.92
David GagnonF18044110.92
Blake BiondiC29303364.50
Yanick TurcotteLW38022151.68
Braden DoyleD1000030.12
Deni GoureC200010.09
Ethan LeyhLW200040.44
Tyler WeissLW10000—

2025-26 goaltending

GoalieGPWSV%GAAGSAx
Cayden Primeau392191.6%2.4116.7
Amir Miftakhov281288.8%3.25-4.6
Nikita Quapp4185.2%3.89-3.3
Pyotr Kochetkov3194.0%1.501.4
Ruslan Khazheyev1190.9%2.771.4

Full schedule · 72 regular + 21 playoff

RecentFull schedule
DateOppResultGoalsxG
2025-10-11@ IAW4–12.9–1.9
2025-10-18vs RFDOTL2–33.8–2.9
2025-10-19vs RFDW6–52.8–2.8
2025-10-25vs MBW4–32.5–3.1
2025-10-28vs RFDL1–61.5–4.4
2025-10-29@ MILL1–42.1–2.5
2025-11-01vs TORW4–12.5–2.0
2025-11-02vs TORL2–42.9–2.6
2025-11-06@ IAL2–32.8–1.9
2025-11-08vs IAW4–04.1–3.0
2025-11-09vs GRW4–32.6–4.4
2025-11-12@ MILOTL3–41.8–2.7
2025-11-15vs CLEW3–23.1–3.8
2025-11-16vs CLEOTL2–33.4–3.3
2025-11-20@ MBL1–22.1–2.2
2025-11-22@ MBL2–31.7–2.8
2025-11-26@ RFDW8–44.1–3.5
2025-11-29@ MBW4–13.5–1.9
2025-11-30@ MBOTL3–43.1–2.4
2025-12-03vs MBL0–53.0–3.9
2025-12-05vs MILW6–43.2–4.0
2025-12-06vs MILW5–23.7–2.0
2025-12-13@ MILW4–22.2–2.9
2025-12-14vs GROTL1–21.3–2.8
2025-12-17vs MILW3–21.6–3.8
2025-12-20vs IAOTL0–12.8–2.0
2025-12-27@ IAOTL1–21.5–3.8
2025-12-31@ RFDW3–23.7–1.3
2026-01-02@ GROTL2–35.2–2.9
2026-01-03vs GRL1–41.6–3.6
2026-01-09@ RFDW3–12.3–1.1
2026-01-10vs TEXL1–33.0–2.8
2026-01-11vs MBW4–33.6–3.2
2026-01-16@ MILW5–42.6–3.8
2026-01-17vs RFDW5–22.8–4.1
2026-01-18@ RFDOTL5–62.3–4.2
2026-01-21@ CLEW6–52.1–4.1
2026-01-22@ CLEOTL6–74.7–4.2
2026-01-24@ RFDW4–12.4–1.9
2026-01-30@ GRW5–22.1–4.2
2026-01-31vs GRL2–52.5–3.3
2026-02-06@ COLW5–41.5–5.3
2026-02-07@ COLL2–61.5–4.5
2026-02-14vs COLW3–25.0–3.5
2026-02-15vs COLW3–23.0–2.9
2026-02-19vs IAW2–02.0–1.3
2026-02-20@ GROTL1–23.1–2.3
2026-02-21vs TEXW5–43.7–2.1
2026-02-28@ TORW5–43.1–1.5
2026-03-01@ TORL2–53.8–2.3
2026-03-03@ MILW4–32.0–2.5
2026-03-07vs TEXL2–43.0–4.2
2026-03-08vs TEXOTL6–73.3–4.8
2026-03-11vs IAL2–42.4–3.4
2026-03-13@ RFDL1–42.4–2.6
2026-03-15vs GRW1–03.0–2.3
2026-03-17@ TEXL1–21.3–2.6
2026-03-18@ TEXL4–53.0–3.2
2026-03-21vs RFDL2–44.0–2.0
2026-03-22vs IAL4–63.2–2.9
2026-03-25@ IAW4–32.8–3.6
2026-03-28@ GROTL2–32.1–3.2
2026-03-29vs MILOTL2–31.9–3.4
2026-04-01@ IAW5–02.2–2.7
2026-04-03@ TEXL1–33.3–1.5
2026-04-04@ TEXL2–41.4–2.9
2026-04-10@ GRW4–13.2–2.3
2026-04-11@ MILOTL3–42.8–3.2
2026-04-12vs RFDW4–23.4–2.4
2026-04-15vs MBW3–21.8–2.7
2026-04-18vs MILW3–02.6–1.8
2026-04-19vs MILW5–12.9–3.0
2026-04-28@ TEXPlayoffL0–21.0–2.5
2026-04-30@ TEXPlayoffW5–42.5–2.7
2026-05-02vs TEXPlayoffW2–12.5–2.0
2026-05-03vs TEXPlayoffOTL4–52.5–4.2
2026-05-05vs TEXPlayoffW6–12.7–1.9
2026-05-14@ GRPlayoffW2–12.6–1.9
2026-05-16@ GRPlayoffW4–32.3–3.6
2026-05-19vs GRPlayoffOTL3–41.8–4.3
2026-05-21vs GRPlayoffW3–22.2–3.0
2026-05-28@ COLPlayoffW3–22.5–3.6
2026-05-30@ COLPlayoffL2–51.4–2.9
2026-06-02vs COLPlayoffL2–32.9–3.0
2026-06-03vs COLPlayoffW2–12.3–3.2
2026-06-05vs COLPlayoffL3–72.4–3.7
2026-06-07@ COLPlayoffW3–21.5–4.0
2026-06-08@ COLPlayoffW4–32.7–3.3
2026-06-12vs TORPlayoffL2–42.2–2.3
2026-06-14vs TORPlayoffOTL4–53.3–3.7
2026-06-16@ TORPlayoffL0–11.5–2.0
2026-06-18@ TORPlayoffW4–31.7–3.4
2026-06-19@ TORPlayoffL3–42.0–2.0