COLPacific Division · 2nd of 10 · Colorado Avalanche

ColoradoEagles

Blue Arena, Loveland, CO

41-20-11
Record: 93
Points: 237
Goals for: 198
Against: +39
Differential

At home20-10-6126–103 (+23)

On the road21-10-5111–95 (+16)

Last 105-4-1 · oldest first

The story

COL generated chances (1st of 32) and gave them back (12th of 32 in chances allowed).

The scoreboard matched the play: within eight goals of expected at both ends.

Where COL ranks

Expected Goals For % · 1 of 32

54.77%

xGF/60 · 1 of 32

3.16

xGA/60 · 12 of 32

2.61

Scoring Chance % · 3 of 32

55.66%

High Danger Chance % · 7 of 32

53.97%

Shooting % · 27 of 32

10.05%

Save % · 6 of 32

89.7%

PDO · 17 of 32

99.7%

Power Play % · 9 of 32

20.40%

Penalty Kill % · 21 of 32

80.71%

Special Teams Index · 15 of 32

101.11%

Rush Share of Goals · 9 of 32

42.6%

Goals For · 8 of 32

237

Goals Against · 7 of 32

198

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

COL2,358 shots · 233 xG

quiet3.4 xG per 5 ft

Allowed1,922 shots · 192 xG

quiet3.4 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

	Goals	Chances	Rate
Power play	61	299	20.4%
Penalty kill	60	311	80.7%

Special-teams index 101.1 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period54.1%of goals scored

Goals: 73–62
xG share: 56.4%

2nd period55.2%of goals scored

Goals: 74–60
xG share: 55.3%

3rd period55.5%of goals scored

Goals: 81–65
xG share: 53.4%

	1st	2nd	3rd
Goals for	73	74	81
Goals against	62	60	65
xG for	77.1	81.3	70.1
xG against	59.6	65.8	61.1
Shots for	787	797	730
Shots against	626	642	619

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

Goals	For	Share	Against	Share
Off the rush	101	42.6%	86	43.4%
Off the cycle	100	42.2%	90	45.5%
In a scramble	33	13.9%	17	8.6%

Attempts	For	Sh%	Against	Sv%
Off the rush	601	16.8%	522	83.5%
Off the cycle	1596	6.3%	1293	93.0%
In a scramble	161	20.5%	107	84.1%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

	For	Against
Shots	2358	1922
Expected goals	233.1	192.4
Scoring chances	925	—
High-danger chances	401	—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score state	Share of play	GF–GA	GF%	GF% ex. EN	xGF%	SF%	Sh%ex. EN	Sv%ex. EN
Leading	41%2,206 min	123–89	58.0%lg 52.7%	51.4%lg 47.9%	53.6%lg 48.0%	52.3%lg 46.5%	8.7%lg 10.4%	91.3%lg 90.4%
Tied	33%1,785 min	85–72	54.1%lg 50.0%	54.1%lg 50.0%	56.4%lg 50.0%	56.6%lg 50.0%	8.7%lg 9.6%	90.4%lg 90.4%
Trailing	25%1,350 min	76–58	56.7%lg 47.3%	59.8%lg 52.1%	58.5%lg 52.0%	59.7%lg 53.5%	9.7%lg 9.6%	90.2%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; COL being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 38

Player	GP	G	A	P	SOG	ixG
Alex Barré-BouletC	70	26	44	70	215	28.72
Jayson MegnaF	69	26	25	51	134	17.09
Jack AhcanD	61	11	39	50	149	9.39
T.J. TynanF	67	3	47	50	91	9.71
Tristen NielsenF	66	28	21	49	163	21.39
Valtteri PuustinenRW	59	12	28	40	121	14.56
Danil GushchinF	49	18	14	32	158	15.22
Tye FelhaberF	63	15	16	31	172	16.39
Ivan IvanF	66	11	15	26	130	16.53
Taylor MakarF	52	14	10	24	92	11.04
Wyatt AamodtD	65	4	20	24	105	4.73
Sean BehrensD	55	5	18	23	52	3.71
Jason PolinF	46	10	11	21	100	13.62
Ronnie AttardD	44	3	14	17	95	5.61
Luke ToporowskiRW	38	8	8	16	63	6.15
Keaton MiddletonD	66	4	10	14	84	3.12
Alex GagneD	58	1	12	13	66	2.22
Mark SendenF	53	4	9	13	65	6.62
Chase BradleyF	42	9	3	12	76	8.95
Jacob MacDonaldD	17	4	8	12	60	3.48
Nikita PrishchepovF	22	3	9	12	23	2.49
Jake WiseF	47	2	9	11	50	4.54
Maroš JedličkaF	43	5	6	11	29	3.63
Bryan YoonD	42	3	5	8	44	2.33
Gavin BrindleyRW	9	2	4	6	18	2.61
Gustav StjernbergD	11	1	2	3	15	0.51
Matt DiMarsicoLW	7	1	2	3	14	1.74
Matthew StienburgF	8	2	1	3	12	1.05
Cooper GayF	11	1	1	2	14	1.45
Hank KempfD	7	0	2	2	7	0.16
Reilly ConnorsC	8	2	0	2	7	1.00
T.J. HughesC	2	1	1	2	8	1.78
Aiden Hansen-BukataD	4	0	1	1	1	0.00
Neil SheaF	1	0	1	1	1	0.06
Saige WeinsteinD	3	1	0	1	2	0.07
Zakhar BardakovLW	1	1	0	1	3	0.40
Chris HeddenD	1	0	0	0	0	—
Ilya SolovyovD	3	0	0	0	4	0.28

2025-26 goaltending

Goalie	GP	W	SV%	GAA	GSAx
Trent Miner	32	17	90.4%	2.62	2.2
Isak Posch	28	15	89.1%	2.78	-4.7
Kyle Keyser	15	9	92.2%	2.09	8.0

Full schedule · 72 regular + 17 playoff

Recent Full schedule

Date	Opp	Result	Goals	xG
2025-10-10	vs CGY	W	7–4	5.2–1.5
2025-10-11	vs CGY	W	1–0	2.5–1.9
2025-10-18	@ CV	W	3–1	1.9–2.1
2025-10-19	@ ONT	L	2–3	2.6–1.5
2025-10-22	@ SD	W	2–0	2.7–2.9
2025-10-24	vs RFD	W	5–0	4.8–2.7
2025-10-25	vs RFD	L	0–4	3.7–2.6
2025-10-28	vs BAK	W	5–4	3.4–2.5
2025-10-29	vs BAK	W	2–1	2.9–2.3
2025-11-01	@ CV	W	3–1	3.3–1.8
2025-11-02	@ SD	W	3–1	3.0–2.0
2025-11-05	@ CV	OTL	5–6	2.3–3.3
2025-11-07	vs ABB	W	4–1	2.9–1.2
2025-11-08	vs ABB	W	3–2	2.0–2.5
2025-11-14	vs TUC	W	6–2	4.0–2.6
2025-11-15	vs TUC	L	0–3	2.8–1.6
2025-11-22	@ TUC	L	1–3	1.7–2.7
2025-11-23	@ TUC	W	5–2	3.3–3.3
2025-11-28	vs SJ	W	4–2	2.5–2.2
2025-11-29	vs SJ	L	3–4	3.5–3.3
2025-12-05	@ RFD	W	5–3	2.7–3.3
2025-12-06	@ RFD	W	2–1	2.2–2.4
2025-12-12	vs ONT	L	2–3	2.8–3.2
2025-12-13	vs ONT	W	6–1	3.5–2.0
2025-12-20	vs HSK	W	2–1	2.3–3.2
2025-12-21	vs HSK	W	3–2	2.1–2.4
2025-12-30	@ CGY	W	6–5	3.7–2.5
2026-01-01	@ CGY	OTL	2–3	2.4–4.3
2026-01-03	@ HSK	W	5–2	3.1–3.1
2026-01-04	@ HSK	L	3–4	3.0–2.4
2026-01-09	vs SD	OTL	4–5	4.5–3.0
2026-01-10	vs SD	W	6–0	4.2–3.1
2026-01-13	vs ONT	L	3–6	3.5–2.3
2026-01-14	vs ONT	OTL	3–4	2.7–4.9
2026-01-17	vs HSK	W	3–0	4.3–4.1
2026-01-18	vs HSK	W	4–1	2.7–3.1
2026-01-21	@ BAK	L	0–3	3.1–2.4
2026-01-23	@ BAK	W	4–1	4.6–2.6
2026-01-24	@ ONT	L	1–4	1.8–2.4
2026-01-28	@ CV	W	2–1	3.4–3.4
2026-01-30	@ TUC	W	3–1	3.6–2.8
2026-01-31	@ TUC	W	3–2	1.9–1.8
2026-02-06	vs CHI	OTL	4–5	5.3–1.5
2026-02-07	vs CHI	W	6–2	4.5–1.5
2026-02-14	@ CHI	OTL	2–3	3.5–5.0
2026-02-15	@ CHI	L	2–3	2.9–3.0
2026-02-20	vs CV	L	0–2	1.9–1.9
2026-02-21	vs CV	W	6–3	4.6–2.4
2026-02-24	vs BAK	W	4–2	3.0–2.4
2026-02-25	vs BAK	OTL	3–4	4.7–3.6
2026-02-28	@ HSK	L	2–4	2.8–3.3
2026-03-01	@ HSK	W	4–3	3.9–2.5
2026-03-03	@ BAK	OTL	4–5	2.9–3.9
2026-03-06	@ ABB	W	5–2	4.0–1.3
2026-03-07	@ ABB	L	0–4	1.6–2.6
2026-03-11	@ ONT	W	4–3	1.9–3.0
2026-03-13	@ SD	W	6–3	2.3–3.2
2026-03-14	@ SD	L	1–2	2.8–2.3
2026-03-17	vs SD	OTL	5–6	3.3–4.6
2026-03-18	vs SD	W	5–1	3.8–2.3
2026-03-21	vs CV	L	2–5	2.0–2.0
2026-03-22	vs CV	OTL	3–4	2.9–2.9
2026-03-27	@ CGY	W	6–3	5.0–2.2
2026-03-29	@ CGY	W	2–1	3.2–2.6
2026-04-01	@ BAK	W	5–2	3.1–2.1
2026-04-03	@ SJ	L	3–6	2.5–3.3
2026-04-04	@ SJ	W	4–2	2.3–2.2
2026-04-07	@ ONT	OTL	1–2	2.4–2.7
2026-04-10	vs TUC	L	2–5	3.1–2.7
2026-04-11	vs TUC	W	3–2	5.7–2.0
2026-04-17	vs CGY	L	2–5	6.4–3.4
2026-04-18	vs CGY	L	5–7	6.1–2.9
2026-04-22	vs SDPlayoff	W	3–0	2.9–1.6
2026-04-24	vs SDPlayoff	W	6–1	3.1–2.2
2026-05-01	@ HSKPlayoff	W	1–0	1.7–1.1
2026-05-04	@ HSKPlayoff	OTL	3–4	3.4–4.7
2026-05-06	vs HSKPlayoff	W	4–0	1.7–1.4
2026-05-09	vs HSKPlayoff	W	6–2	3.5–1.8
2026-05-13	@ CVPlayoff	W	3–0	2.9–1.4
2026-05-15	@ CVPlayoff	L	0–4	2.7–2.2
2026-05-17	vs CVPlayoff	W	4–1	4.5–2.9
2026-05-20	vs CVPlayoff	W	3–2	2.3–2.9
2026-05-28	vs CHIPlayoff	L	2–3	3.6–2.5
2026-05-30	vs CHIPlayoff	W	5–2	2.9–1.4
2026-06-02	@ CHIPlayoff	W	3–2	3.0–2.9
2026-06-03	@ CHIPlayoff	L	1–2	3.2–2.3
2026-06-05	@ CHIPlayoff	W	7–3	3.7–2.4
2026-06-07	vs CHIPlayoff	L	2–3	4.0–1.5
2026-06-08	vs CHIPlayoff	L	3–4	3.3–2.7