AHLDashboard
TORNorth Division · 4th of 7 · Toronto Maple Leafs

TorontoMarlies

Coca-Cola Coliseum, Toronto, ON

36-26-10
Record
82
Points
229
Goals for
228
Against
+1
Differential
At home21-11-4125–108 (+17)
On the road15-15-6104–120 (-16)
Last 105-5-0 · oldest first

The story

By chance quality TOR were a middle club: 31st of 32 in creation, 18th of 32 in suppression.

They finished 49 goals above what the chances were worth (4th of 32 in shooting), and conceded 33 more than the chances against were worth (17th of 32 in save percentage).

The penalty kill 7th of 32 at 83.3%.

Where TOR ranks

Expected Goals For % · 25 of 32
48.00%
xGF/60 · 31 of 32
2.45
xGA/60 · 18 of 32
2.66
Scoring Chance % · 17 of 32
49.40%
High Danger Chance % · 13 of 32
49.32%
Shooting % · 4 of 32
12.25%
Save % · 17 of 32
89.1%
PDO · 7 of 32
101.3%
Power Play % · 15 of 32
18.39%
Penalty Kill % · 7 of 32
83.33%
Special Teams Index · 12 of 32
101.73%
Rush Share of Goals · 23 of 32
38.0%
Goals For · 14 of 32
229
Goals Against · 18 of 32
228

Each bar is a percentile against all 32 clubs, with the league median on the tick. Metrics where less is better are flipped, so longer is always better.

Shots for and against

TOR1,870 shots · 180 xG
quiet3.3 xG per 5 ft
Allowed2,087 shots · 195 xG
quiet3.3 xG per 5 ft

Special teams

GoalsChancesRate
Power play5529918.4%
Penalty kill5331883.3%

Special-teams index 101.7 — power play plus penalty kill, the one number that says whether a club wins the nights the referee decides.

How the game unfolds

1st period47.3%of goals scored
Goals
61–68
xG share
46.4%
2nd period55.0%of goals scored
Goals
82–67
xG share
50.8%
3rd period48.4%of goals scored
Goals
78–83
xG share
46.8%
1st2nd3rd
Goals for618278
Goals against686783
xG for54.466.756.1
xG against62.764.563.8
Shots for611672560
Shots against689694674

Share of goals is this club’s goals as a percentage of every goal scored in that period, so 50% is even. xG share is the same sum over chance quality, which says whether the result matched the play. Regulation only — overtime is three skaters a side and a different game.

How the goals came

GoalsForShareAgainstShare
Off the rush8738.0%9441.2%
Off the cycle10746.7%9843.0%
In a scramble3214.0%3113.6%
AttemptsForSh%AgainstSv%
Off the rush47218.4%47980.4%
Off the cycle12908.3%147993.4%
In a scramble10829.6%12976.0%

A rush is the first shot of a possession, taken inside 40 ft up the middle; the cycle is a shot after sustained pressure, or a first shot from distance or the wall; a scramble is a second attempt inside four seconds. League-wide they convert at about 17%, 8% and 23%. Shares are of goals scored in play — shootout winners are not shots.

Volume

ForAgainst
Shots18702087
Expected goals180.2195.2
Scoring chances656—
High-danger chances290—

With a lead, level, and from behind

Score stateShare of playGF–GAGF%GF% ex. ENxGF%SF%Sh%ex. ENSv%ex. EN
Leading36%2,053 min106–8854.6%lg 52.5%49.4%lg 47.9%47.1%lg 48.1%43.4%lg 46.5%11.0%lg 10.4%91.6%lg 90.4%
Tied30%1,738 min82–9247.1%lg 50.0%47.1%lg 50.0%49.0%lg 50.0%48.4%lg 50.0%10.4%lg 9.6%89.1%lg 90.4%
Trailing34%1,970 min105–9652.2%lg 47.4%56.1%lg 52.1%50.7%lg 52.0%51.1%lg 53.5%11.8%lg 9.6%90.2%lg 89.6%

Regulation only — overtime is three-on-three and always starts level, so pooling it here would contaminate every rate. The small figure under each percentage is the league in the same score state; TOR being above it is the claim, not the percentage itself. GF% ex. EN drops empty-net goals from both sides, and across the league it reverses the headline: clubs are outscored at even play while protecting a lead, and outscore while chasing. The empty net is what settles it.

2025-26 skaters · 38

PlayerGPGAPSOGixG
Logan ShawF7223315413317.09
Alex NylanderRW6524295315316.02
Benoit-Olivier GroulxC5928245213615.36
Vinni LettieriC5514284214213.39
Jacob QuillanC401422367010.61
Ryan TverbergF631521368813.24
Luke HaymesC6617163311014.54
William VilleneuveD6132730853.67
Travis BoydF34101929474.90
Matthew BarboliniF6291827556.01
Marc JohnstoneRW5791726697.97
Borya ValisF6015102511512.10
Henry ThrunD5551823793.82
Noah ChadwickD6851823773.99
Cédric ParéF62715227710.07
Matt BenningD3431316481.53
Reese JohnsonRW476915666.75
Michael PezzettaLW395611424.09
Blake SmithD62189591.85
Chas SharpeD33369411.26
Dakota MermisD27167371.72
Marshall RifaiD20055270.96
Ben KingC20224152.10
Brandon BaddockLW20134121.33
Cade WebberD33033100.36
Easton CowanLW412360.59
John ProkopD24123200.66
Landon SimF13303141.47
Ryan KirwanLW812391.21
Brandon BuhrF502220.19
David KämpfF401140.29
Miroslav HolinkaC10110—
Rhett ParsonsD801120.05
Vinny BorgesiD701180.30
Frank DjurasevicD200030.07
Hayes HundleyD100010.02
Ryan McClearyD10000—
Sam StevensC400080.62

2025-26 goaltending

GoalieGPWSV%GAAGSAx
Artur Akhtyamov372190.4%2.88-8.3
Dennis Hildeby231089.8%2.71-2.9
Vyacheslav Peksa12486.9%3.78-7.9
Joseph Woll2088.5%3.72-0.1
Ken Appleby2190.9%2.550.4

Full schedule · 72 regular + 24 playoff

RecentFull schedule
DateOppResultGoalsxG
2025-10-10@ ROCL3–42.5–2.5
2025-10-11vs ROCW4–12.4–3.2
2025-10-18@ BELW2–12.5–1.9
2025-10-19vs UTCW3–23.2–2.5
2025-10-25vs BELL2–42.9–1.9
2025-10-26vs BELOTL4–52.9–2.7
2025-10-29vs SYRL4–52.6–2.4
2025-11-01@ CHIL1–42.0–2.5
2025-11-02@ CHIW4–22.6–2.9
2025-11-05@ WBSW4–32.1–2.4
2025-11-07@ HERW5–22.6–1.5
2025-11-08@ LVL2–32.2–3.1
2025-11-12@ GROTL2–33.8–3.8
2025-11-14@ GRL2–51.5–2.2
2025-11-19@ BELL0–41.9–3.9
2025-11-22vs IAW7–22.9–2.4
2025-11-23vs IAW2–12.6–2.1
2025-11-26vs PROL1–53.5–2.4
2025-11-28@ CLTL1–51.6–3.9
2025-11-29@ CLTW5–33.0–3.9
2025-12-03@ BELW4–33.1–2.1
2025-12-06vs GRL2–32.4–2.8
2025-12-07vs GRL2–41.8–1.5
2025-12-10@ LAVW5–43.0–3.3
2025-12-12@ LAVL2–52.1–3.0
2025-12-14vs CLEW3–21.4–2.9
2025-12-20vs BELW4–32.2–2.2
2025-12-21@ BELL4–81.9–4.0
2025-12-26vs BELW3–23.0–2.1
2025-12-27@ UTCW4–32.3–3.0
2025-12-30@ CLEW2–11.7–2.0
2026-01-01vs SYRW2–11.5–2.8
2026-01-03vs ROCW6–42.7–3.0
2026-01-04vs LVL1–62.2–2.7
2026-01-07vs CLEOTL4–52.8–2.5
2026-01-09vs BELW6–12.5–1.5
2026-01-10@ BELL3–62.6–3.8
2026-01-16@ IAW3–22.8–1.9
2026-01-17@ IAW5–42.6–2.6
2026-01-23@ SPROTL3–43.4–3.3
2026-01-24@ HFDW4–12.9–3.9
2026-01-25@ PROOTL3–43.3–4.3
2026-01-31vs LAVOTL2–32.2–2.2
2026-02-03@ CLEOTL2–33.3–3.3
2026-02-07vs SPRW5–13.7–2.3
2026-02-14@ LAVL2–41.4–2.5
2026-02-16vs LAVW4–33.7–2.0
2026-02-18vs HERL2–33.0–1.8
2026-02-20@ CLEL2–42.4–3.4
2026-02-21@ CLEOTL2–33.7–1.7
2026-02-25@ LAVW4–12.0–1.7
2026-02-28vs CHIOTL4–51.5–3.1
2026-03-01vs CHIW5–22.3–3.8
2026-03-04vs CLEW7–42.0–3.4
2026-03-06@ MBL2–32.5–2.7
2026-03-08@ MBL0–12.1–2.5
2026-03-11@ SYRW5–12.7–3.1
2026-03-13@ ROCOTL3–42.3–3.3
2026-03-14vs ROCW3–03.0–1.5
2026-03-17vs CLEW4–22.3–3.0
2026-03-21vs HFDW6–33.7–3.2
2026-03-22vs WBSL3–41.8–2.0
2026-03-25vs MBW4–11.3–2.3
2026-03-27@ ROCL2–52.3–3.4
2026-03-31vs MBL1–53.9–2.5
2026-04-03vs CLTL2–31.2–2.8
2026-04-04vs CLTL1–52.5–3.1
2026-04-08vs UTCW4–32.5–1.7
2026-04-10@ UTCL3–61.9–2.5
2026-04-12@ SYRW4–12.4–3.1
2026-04-18vs LAVW4–31.1–3.5
2026-04-19vs LAVW4–23.8–2.8
2026-04-22vs ROCPlayoffW5–02.8–1.3
2026-04-24@ ROCPlayoffL0–42.3–2.1
2026-04-26vs ROCPlayoffW4–24.0–2.5
2026-04-29@ LAVPlayoffL1–31.6–2.3
2026-05-01@ LAVPlayoffW6–24.1–2.5
2026-05-03vs LAVPlayoffW6–22.6–1.8
2026-05-05vs LAVPlayoffL0–41.6–2.7
2026-05-09@ LAVPlayoffW3–21.4–1.1
2026-05-14@ CLEPlayoffW5–21.7–3.5
2026-05-16@ CLEPlayoffL1–31.9–2.3
2026-05-20vs CLEPlayoffL0–41.5–2.8
2026-05-22vs CLEPlayoffW5–22.0–2.8
2026-05-24@ CLEPlayoffW3–22.1–2.6
2026-05-27@ WBSPlayoffW4–21.1–3.0
2026-05-29@ WBSPlayoffW2–13.1–2.7
2026-06-01vs WBSPlayoffL3–54.8–3.4
2026-06-03vs WBSPlayoffL3–42.9–2.2
2026-06-05vs WBSPlayoffW5–12.2–2.6
2026-06-07@ WBSPlayoffW2–13.1–2.7
2026-06-12@ CHIPlayoffW4–22.3–2.2
2026-06-14@ CHIPlayoffW5–43.7–3.3
2026-06-16vs CHIPlayoffW1–02.0–1.5
2026-06-18vs CHIPlayoffOTL3–43.4–1.7
2026-06-19vs CHIPlayoffW4–32.0–2.0